Shavelle David M, Zheng Ling, Ottochian Marcus, Wagman Brittany, Testa Nicholas, Hall Stephanie, Koenig William, Chan Linda S, Matthews Ray V
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033, USA.
Acute Card Care. 2013 Sep;15(3):52-7. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2013.776690. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
Evaluate treatment times and clinical outcome in a consecutive series of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Los Angeles County.
Primary PCI for STEMI is beneficial if performed in a timely manner. Conflicting data exist regarding potential treatment delays for primary PCI performed during off hours.
The Emergency Medical Services STEMI Receiving Center Database was queried from 2007 to 2009 to identify patients with a pre-hospital ECG showing STEMI who underwent PCI. On-hour PCI (On-hour Group, n = 1324) was defined as PCI occurring from 8 am to 5 pm and off-hour PCI (Off-hour Group, n = 922) was defined as occurring from 5 pm to 8 am. Treatment times, length of stay, vascular complications, achievement of TIMI 3 flow and in-hospital mortality were evaluated.
Off-hours PCI occurred in 41% of patients. Medical contact to door time was similar in the Off-hour Group compared to the On-hour Group, 20.7 ± 14.6 versus 20.3 ± 12.3 min, respectively, P = 0.47. In patients with available data (n = 1366), the door-to-catheterization laboratory (CL) activation time was significantly shorter in the On-hour Group as compared to the Off-hour Group, -4.9 ± 11.9 versus -0.2 ± 27.5 min, respectively, P < 0.0001. Door-to-balloon time was significantly longer in the Off-hour Group compared to the On-hour Group, 74 ± 35 versus 60 ± 26 min respectively, P < 0.0001. Length of stay, vascular complications, final TIMI 3 flow and in-hospital mortality were similar between both groups.
In STEMI patients receiving primary PCI in Los Angeles County, off-hour PCI was common. Short-term clinical outcomes were similar despite longer door-to-balloon time in patients receiving off-hour PCI. The longer door-to-balloon time in the off-hour PCI patients were partly explained by longer door-to-CL activation time.
评估洛杉矶县一系列接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的治疗时间和临床结局。
及时进行直接PCI对STEMI有益。关于非工作时间进行直接PCI时潜在的治疗延迟存在相互矛盾的数据。
查询2007年至2009年紧急医疗服务STEMI接收中心数据库,以识别有院前心电图显示STEMI且接受PCI的患者。工作时间内PCI(工作时间组,n = 1324)定义为上午8点至下午5点进行的PCI,非工作时间PCI(非工作时间组,n = 922)定义为下午5点至上午8点进行的PCI。评估治疗时间、住院时间、血管并发症、TIMI 3级血流的实现情况和院内死亡率。
41%的患者接受非工作时间PCI。非工作时间组与工作时间组的医疗接触至入院时间相似,分别为20.7±14.6分钟和20.3±12.3分钟,P = 0.47。在有可用数据的患者(n = 1366)中,工作时间组的入院至导管室(CL)激活时间明显短于非工作时间组,分别为-4.9±11.9分钟和-0.2±27.5分钟,P < 0.0001。非工作时间组的入院至球囊扩张时间明显长于工作时间组,分别为74±35分钟和60±26分钟,P < 0.0001。两组之间的住院时间、血管并发症、最终TIMI 3级血流和院内死亡率相似。
在洛杉矶县接受直接PCI的STEMI患者中,非工作时间PCI很常见。尽管非工作时间PCI患者的入院至球囊扩张时间更长,但短期临床结局相似。非工作时间PCI患者较长的入院至球囊扩张时间部分归因于较长的入院至CL激活时间。