Suppr超能文献

电子监测对隔离措施的影响。

Impact of electronic surveillance on isolation practices.

机构信息

Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;34(7):694-9. doi: 10.1086/671001. Epub 2013 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of an electronic surveillance system on isolation practices and rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

DESIGN

A pre-post test intervention.

SETTING

Inpatient units (except psychiatry and labor and delivery) in 4 New York City hospitals.

PATIENTS

All patients for whom isolation precautions were indicated, May 2009-December 2011.

METHODS

Trained observers assessed isolation sign postings, availability of isolation carts, and staff use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Infection rates were obtained from the infection control department. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between the surveillance system, infection prevention practices, and MRSA infection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 54,159 isolation days and 7,628 staff opportunities for donning PPE were observed over a 31-month period. Odds of having an appropriate sign posted were significantly higher after intervention than before intervention (odds ratio [OR], 1.10 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-1.20]). Relative to baseline, postintervention sign posting improved significantly for airborne and droplet precautions but not for contact precautions. Sign posting improved for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.23-1.86]; [Formula: see text]), Clostridium difficile (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.27-2.02]; [Formula: see text]), and Acinetobacter baumannii (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.64]; [Formula: see text]) precautions but not for MRSA precautions (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.89-1.39]; [Formula: see text]). Staff and visitor adherence to PPE remained low throughout the study but improved from 29.1% to 37.0% after the intervention (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.29]). MRSA infection rates were not significantly different after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic surveillance system resulted in small but statistically significant improvements in isolation practices but no reductions in infection rates over the short term. Such innovations likely require considerable uptake time.

摘要

目的

评估电子监测系统对隔离实践和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染率的影响。

设计

前后测试干预。

设置

在纽约市 4 家医院的住院病房(精神病科和产房除外)。

患者

2009 年 5 月至 2011 年 12 月期间,所有需要隔离预防措施的患者。

方法

经过培训的观察员评估隔离标志张贴、隔离车的供应情况以及员工使用个人防护设备(PPE)的情况。感染率从感染控制部门获得。回归分析用于检查监测系统、感染预防实践和 MRSA 感染率之间的关联。

结果

在 31 个月的时间里,共观察到 54159 天的隔离和 7628 次员工佩戴 PPE 的机会。与干预前相比,干预后适当标志张贴的可能性显著更高(比值比[OR],1.10[95%置信区间{CI},1.01-1.20])。与基线相比,干预后空气传播和飞沫隔离措施的标志张贴显著改善,但接触隔离措施无改善。万古霉素耐药肠球菌(OR,1.51[95%CI,1.23-1.86];[公式:见文本])、艰难梭菌(OR,1.59[95%CI,1.27-2.02];[公式:见文本])和鲍曼不动杆菌(OR,1.41[95%CI,1.21-1.64];[公式:见文本])的标志张贴改善,但 MRSA 预防措施的标志张贴无改善(OR,1.11[95%CI,0.89-1.39];[公式:见文本])。研究期间,员工和访客对 PPE 的依从性一直较低,但干预后从 29.1%提高到 37.0%(OR,1.14[95%CI,1.01-1.29])。干预后 MRSA 感染率无显著差异。

结论

电子监测系统在短期内导致隔离实践的微小但具有统计学意义的改善,但未降低感染率。此类创新可能需要相当长的时间才能被采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验