• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 OVERSEER®模型核算到农场门口的农场特定农业副产物碳足迹。

Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model.

机构信息

AgResearch, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.

出版信息

Animal. 2013 Jun;7 Suppl 2:437-43. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000797.

DOI:10.1017/S1751731113000797
PMID:23739485
Abstract

The user inputs to OVERSEER® Nutrient Budgets (Overseer) allow farm-specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to be estimated. Since the development of the original model, life cycle assessment standards (e.g. PAS 2050) have been proposed and adopted for determining GHG or carbon footprints, which are usually reported as emissions per unit of product, for example, per kg milk, meat or wool. New Zealand pastoral farms frequently generate a range of products with different management practices. A robust system is required to allocate the individual sources of GHGs (e.g. methane, nitrous oxide, direct carbon dioxide and embodied carbon dioxide emissions for inputs used on the farm) to each product from a farm. This paper describes a method for allocating emissions to co-products from New Zealand farms. The method requires allocating the emissions, first, to an animal enterprise, separating the emissions between breeding and trading animals, and then allocating to a specific product to give product (e.g. milk, meat, wool, velvet) footprints from the 'cradle-to-farm-gate'. The meat product was based on live-weight gain. Procedures were adopted so that emissions associated with rearing of young stock used in live-weight gain systems, both as a by-product or a primary product could be estimated. This allows the possibility of total emissions for a meat product to be built up from contributing farms along the production chain.

摘要

用户在 OVERSEER® 养分预算(Overseer)中输入的数据可用于估算特定农场的温室气体(GHG)排放量。自最初模型开发以来,生命周期评估标准(例如 PAS 2050)已被提出并采用,用于确定 GHG 或碳足迹,通常以产品的单位排放量报告,例如每千克牛奶、肉或羊毛。新西兰牧场农场经常生产具有不同管理实践的多种产品。需要建立一个强大的系统来将农场使用的各种投入品(例如甲烷、氧化亚氮、直接二氧化碳和嵌入二氧化碳排放)的单个 GHG 源分配给农场的每种产品。本文介绍了一种从新西兰农场分配共同产品排放的方法。该方法要求首先将排放分配给动物企业,将养殖和交易动物之间的排放分开,然后将其分配给特定产品,以给出从“摇篮到农场门”的产品(例如牛奶、肉、羊毛、绒)足迹。肉类产品以活体重增加为基础。采用了一些程序,以便可以估算在活体重增加系统中作为副产品或主要产品饲养幼畜所产生的排放。这使得可以从生产链中的参与农场来构建肉类产品的总排放量。

相似文献

1
Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model.采用 OVERSEER®模型核算到农场门口的农场特定农业副产物碳足迹。
Animal. 2013 Jun;7 Suppl 2:437-43. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000797.
2
Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.加利福尼亚州牛肉生产系统的碳足迹和氨排放。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4641-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4653. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3
The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.乳制品生产系统的碳足迹通过部分生命周期评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1266-82. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162.
4
Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.动物食品消费和生产导致温室气体排放的趋势-对长期气候目标的影响。
Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):330-40. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001498. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
5
An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian vegetables industry.澳大利亚蔬菜产业温室气体排放评估。
J Environ Sci Health B. 2010 Aug;45(6):578-88. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2010.493497.
6
Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.林业作业的温室气体排放:生命周期评估
J Environ Qual. 2006 Jul 6;35(4):1439-50. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0159. Print 2006 Jul-Aug.
7
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
8
Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.促生长技术降低了加利福尼亚牛肉生产系统的碳足迹、氨气排放和成本。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4656-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4654. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
9
The influence of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral dairy farms.荷斯坦-弗里生牛品种和饲养方式对放牧奶牛场温室气体排放的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3390-402. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2790.
10
Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.加拿大乳制品的碳足迹:计算与问题。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):6091-104. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6563. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing profitable and climate-smart farms using virtual reality.利用虚拟现实设计盈利且有利于气候的农场。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286723. eCollection 2023.