Eikard B, Skovsted P
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1975;19(2):120-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1975.tb05231.x.
Hypercarbia was induced in 12 patients anesthetized with either halothane or fluroxene in an inspired concentration of approximately 1.3 MAC (1% halothane and 4-5% fluroxene). The six patients receiving halothane anesthesia responded to hypercarbia with a pronounced tachycardia, an increased arterial pressure and an electrocardiographically monitored threshold level for ventricular arrhythmias at a Paco2 level averaging 98 mmHg. The six patients receiving fluroxene anesthesia responded to hypercarbia with both tachycardia and hypertension, but in spite of an average Paco2 level of 109 mmHg, no ventricular arrhythmias could be provoked. It is therefore suggested that within the non-narcotic level of hypercarbia a threshold level for cardiac arrhythmias does not exist under fluroxene anesthesia.
对12例分别用氟烷或氟烯醚麻醉的患者进行高碳酸血症诱导,吸入浓度约为1.3MAC(1%氟烷和4 - 5%氟烯醚)。接受氟烷麻醉的6例患者对高碳酸血症的反应是明显的心动过速、动脉压升高以及在平均动脉二氧化碳分压(Paco2)水平为98mmHg时通过心电图监测到室性心律失常的阈值水平。接受氟烯醚麻醉的6例患者对高碳酸血症的反应是心动过速和高血压,但尽管平均Paco2水平为109mmHg,却未诱发室性心律失常。因此,有人提出在非麻醉性高碳酸血症水平下,氟烯醚麻醉时不存在心律失常的阈值水平。