Hôpital Lapeyronie, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Université Montpellier I, Montpellier, France.
Southend University Hospital, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1477-86. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203229. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous golimumab as add-on therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment. To evaluate an intravenous plus subcutaneous (IV+SC) golimumab strategy in patients who had not attained remission.
GO-MORE was an open-label, multinational, prospective study in patients with active RA in typical clinical practice settings. In part 1, patients received add-on monthly 50-mg subcutaneous golimumab for 6 months. The percentage of patients with good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) response was compared in patient subgroups with various concurrent or previous DMARD treatments. In part 2, patients with EULAR responses but not remission were randomly assigned to receive IV+SC or subcutaneous golimumab to month 12; DAS28-ESR remission was measured.
3366 patients were enrolled. At baseline of part 1, 3280 efficacy-evaluable patients had mean disease duration of 7.6 years and mean DAS28-ESR of 5.97 (SD=1.095). At month 6, 82.1% achieved good/moderate EULAR responses and 23.9% attained remission. When EULAR responses were analysed by the number of previously failed DMARD or the concomitant methotrexate dose, DMARD type, or corticosteroid use, no statistically significant differences were observed. Part 2 patients (N=490) who received IV+SC or subcutaneous golimumab achieved similar remission rates (∼25%). Adverse events were consistent with previous reports of golimumab and other tumour necrosis antagonists in this population.
Add-on monthly subcutaneous golimumab resulted in good/moderate EULAR response in most patients; 25% achieved remission after 6 more months of golimumab, but an IV+SC regimen provided no additional efficacy over the subcutaneous regimen.
评估皮下注射戈利木单抗作为附加疗法在接受疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗但仍处于活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的疗效和安全性。评估未达到缓解的患者采用静脉加皮下(IV+SC)戈利木单抗的策略。
GO-MORE 是一项在典型临床实践环境中进行的、开放性、多国、前瞻性研究,纳入了处于活动期 RA 的患者。在第 1 部分中,患者接受每月 50mg 皮下注射戈利木单抗附加治疗,共 6 个月。比较了不同同时或先前 DMARD 治疗的患者亚组中具有良好/中度欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)28 关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)-红细胞沉降率(ESR)反应的患者比例。在第 2 部分中,EULAR 有反应但未缓解的患者随机分配至接受 IV+SC 或皮下戈利木单抗治疗至第 12 个月;测量 DAS28-ESR 缓解情况。
共纳入 3366 例患者。第 1 部分的疗效可评估患者 3280 例,基线时的平均疾病病程为 7.6 年,平均 DAS28-ESR 为 5.97(标准差[SD]=1.095)。治疗 6 个月时,82.1%的患者达到良好/中度 EULAR 反应,23.9%的患者达到缓解。根据先前失败的 DMARD 数量、同时使用的甲氨蝶呤剂量、DMARD 类型或皮质类固醇使用情况分析 EULAR 反应时,未观察到有统计学意义的差异。接受 IV+SC 或皮下戈利木单抗治疗的第 2 部分患者(N=490)达到相似的缓解率(约 25%)。不良事件与该人群中先前戈利木单抗和其他肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂的报告一致。
每月皮下注射戈利木单抗附加治疗使大多数患者达到良好/中度 EULAR 反应;再接受 6 个月戈利木单抗治疗后 25%的患者达到缓解,但 IV+SC 方案并未比皮下方案提供额外疗效。