Fletcher-Smith Joanna C, Walker Marion F, Cobley Christine S, Steultjens Esther M J, Sackley Catherine M
Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing,University ofNottingham,Nottingham,UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD010116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010116.pub2.
Stroke is a worldwide problem and is a leading cause of adult disability, resulting in dependency in activities of daily living (ADL) for around half of stroke survivors. It is estimated that up to 25% of all care home residents in the USA and in the UK have had a stroke. Stroke survivors who reside in care homes are likely to be more physically and cognitively impaired and therefore more dependent than those able to remain in their own home. Overall, 75% of care home residents are classified as severely disabled, and those with stroke are likely to have high levels of immobility, incontinence and confusion, as well as additional co-morbidities. It is not known whether this clinically complex population could benefit from occupational therapy in the same way as community-dwelling stroke survivors. The care home population with stroke differs from the general stroke population living at home, and a review was needed to examine the benefits of occupational therapy provided to this specific group. This review therefore focused on occupational therapy interventions for ADL for stroke survivors residing in care homes.
To measure the effects of occupational therapy interventions (provided directly by an occupational therapist or under the supervision of an occupational therapist) targeted at improving, restoring and maintaining independence in ADL among stroke survivors residing in long-term institutional care, termed collectively as 'care homes'. As a secondary objective, we aimed to evaluate occupational therapy interventions for reducing complications such as depression and low mood.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (August 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, September 2012), MEDLINE (1948 to September 2012), EMBASE (1980 to September 2012), CINAHL (1982 to September 2012) and 10 additional bibliographic databases and six trials registers. We also handsearched seven journals, checked reference lists and obtained further information from individual trialists.
Randomised controlled trials investigating the impact of an occupational therapy intervention for care home residents with stroke versus standard care.
The lead review author performed all searches. Two review authors then independently assessed all titles and abstracts of studies and selected trials for inclusion, with a third review author resolving any discrepancies. The same two review authors independently extracted data from all included published sources to ensure reliability. Primary outcomes were performance in ADL at the end of scheduled follow-up and death or a poor outcome. Secondary outcomes aimed to reflect the domains targeted by an occupational therapy intervention.
We included in the review one study involving 118 participants. We found one ongoing study that also met the inclusion criteria for the review, but the data were not yet available.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found insufficient evidence to support or refute the efficacy of occupational therapy interventions for improving, restoring or maintaining independence in ADL for stroke survivors residing in care homes. The effectiveness of occupational therapy for the population of stroke survivors residing in care homes remains unclear, and further research in this area is warranted.
中风是一个全球性问题,是成人残疾的主要原因,约一半的中风幸存者在日常生活活动(ADL)方面存在依赖。据估计,美国和英国高达25%的养老院居民曾患过中风。与能够居家生活的中风幸存者相比,居住在养老院的中风幸存者身体和认知功能可能受损更严重,因此依赖性更强。总体而言,75%的养老院居民被归类为严重残疾,中风患者可能存在高度的行动不便、大小便失禁和意识混乱,以及其他合并症。尚不清楚这一临床情况复杂的人群是否能像社区中风幸存者一样从职业治疗中获益。养老院中的中风患者群体与居家的一般中风患者群体不同,因此需要进行一项综述来研究针对这一特定群体提供职业治疗的益处。因此,本综述聚焦于针对居住在养老院的中风幸存者ADL的职业治疗干预措施。
衡量职业治疗干预措施(由职业治疗师直接提供或在其监督下进行)对改善、恢复和维持长期机构护理(统称为“养老院”)中中风幸存者ADL独立性的效果。作为次要目的,我们旨在评估职业治疗干预措施对减少诸如抑郁和情绪低落等并发症的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane中风组试验注册库(2012年8月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆,2012年9月)、MEDLINE(1948年至2012年9月)、EMBASE(1980年至2012年9月)、CINAHL(1982年至2012年9月)以及另外10个书目数据库和6个试验注册库。我们还手工检索了7种期刊,检查了参考文献列表,并从各试验研究者处获取了更多信息。
调查职业治疗干预措施对养老院中风患者与标准护理相比影响的随机对照试验。
首席综述作者进行了所有检索。然后由两位综述作者独立评估所有研究的标题和摘要,并选择纳入试验,第三位综述作者解决任何分歧。同样的两位综述作者独立从所有纳入的已发表资料中提取数据以确保可靠性。主要结局为预定随访结束时的ADL表现以及死亡或不良结局。次要结局旨在反映职业治疗干预措施所针对的领域。
我们在综述中纳入了一项涉及118名参与者的研究。我们发现一项正在进行的研究也符合综述的纳入标准,但数据尚未可得。
我们发现证据不足,无法支持或反驳职业治疗干预措施对改善、恢复或维持居住在养老院的中风幸存者ADL独立性的疗效。职业治疗对居住在养老院的中风幸存者群体的有效性仍不明确,该领域需要进一步研究。