Suppr超能文献

肝转移瘤的冷冻治疗

Cryotherapy for liver metastases.

作者信息

Bala Malgorzata M, Riemsma Robert P, Wolff Robert, Kleijnen Jos

机构信息

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5(6):CD009058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009058.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma are the two most common malignant tumours to affect the liver. The liver is second only to the lymph nodes as the most common site for metastatic disease. More than half of the patients with metastatic liver disease will die from metastatic complications. In cryoablation, liquid nitrogen or argon gas is delivered to the liver tumour, guided by ultrasound using a specially designed probe. Ice crystal formation during the rapid freezing process causes destruction of cellular structure and kills the tumour cells.

OBJECTIVES

To study the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in patients with liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, LILACS, and CINAHL up to December 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials assessing the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Bias risk assessment of and data extraction from the trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were done by one author and checked by a second author.

MAIN RESULTS

One randomised clinical trial fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the review. The trial was judged as a trial with high risk of bias due to the unclear report on the generation of the allocation sequence and allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data and the selective outcome reporting domain. The trial included 123 consecutive patients with solitary or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases who were randomised into two groups, 63 received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 females and 87 males. The primary sites for the metastases were colorectal (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), melanoma (4.9%), ovarian adenocarcinoma (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestinal (1.6%), pancreatic (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The tumours were resectable and non-resectable.The patients were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). Mortality at the last follow-up was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02); that is, no statistically significant difference was observed. In the cryotherapy group, 60%, 44%, and 19% of the participants survived 3, 5, and 10 years respectively, while in the conventional surgery group the percentages were 51%, 36%, and 8%. The hazard ratio calculated using the Parmar method was 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.09). Recurrence in the liver was observed in 86% (54/63) of the patients in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the patients in the conventional surgery group (relative risk (RR) 0.9; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.01); that is, no statistically significant difference was observed. Frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the control group. However, it was not reported by the authors whether the differences were significant. No intervention-related mortality and no bile leakage were observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of one randomised clinical trial with high risk of bias, there is insufficient evidence to conclude if in patients with liver metastases from various primary sites cryotherapy brings any significant benefit in terms of survival or recurrence compared with conventional surgery. In addition, there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy when compared with no intervention. At present, cryotherapy cannot be recommended outside randomised clinical trials.

摘要

背景

原发性肝癌和结直肠癌肝转移是影响肝脏的两种最常见的恶性肿瘤。肝脏是仅次于淋巴结的最常见转移部位。超过一半的肝转移患者会死于转移并发症。在冷冻消融中,液氮或氩气通过专门设计的探头在超声引导下输送到肝肿瘤。快速冷冻过程中冰晶的形成会破坏细胞结构并杀死肿瘤细胞。

目的

研究与不干预、其他消融方法或全身治疗相比,冷冻疗法对肝转移患者的有益和有害影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane肝胆组对照试验注册库、Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引扩展版、LILACS和CINAHL,检索截止至2012年12月。

选择标准

我们纳入了所有评估冷冻疗法及其对照的有益和有害影响的随机临床试验,无论原发肿瘤的位置如何。

数据收集与分析

我们提取了有关参与者特征、干预措施、研究结果的相关信息以及我们综述的结果数据,以及试验的设计和方法信息。由一位作者对符合纳入标准的试验进行偏倚风险评估和数据提取,并由另一位作者进行核对。

主要结果

一项随机临床试验符合综述的纳入标准。由于分配序列的产生、分配隐藏、盲法、不完整的结局数据和选择性结局报告领域的报告不明确,该试验被判定为偏倚风险高的试验。该试验纳入了123例连续的孤立性或多发性单叶或双叶肝转移患者,随机分为两组,63例接受冷冻疗法,60例接受传统手术。有36名女性和87名男性。转移的原发部位为结直肠癌(66.6%)、胃(7.3%)、乳腺(6.5%)、黑色素瘤(4.9%)、卵巢腺癌(4.1%)、子宫(3.3%)、肾(3.3%)、肠道(1.6%)、胰腺(1.6%)和未知(0.8%)。肿瘤可切除和不可切除。对患者进行了长达10年(最短5个月)的随访。冷冻疗法组最后一次随访时的死亡率为81%(51/63),传统手术组为92%(55/60)(风险比0.88;95%置信区间0.77至1.02);即未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在冷冻疗法组中,分别有60%、44%和19%的参与者存活了3年、5年和10年,而在传统手术组中这一比例分别为51%、36%和8%。使用Parmar方法计算的风险比为0.71(95%置信区间0.47至1.09)。冷冻疗法组86%(54/63)的患者和传统手术组95%(57/60)的患者出现肝脏复发(相对风险0.9;95%置信区间0.8至1.01);即未观察到统计学上的显著差异。除术后疼痛外,冷冻疗法组和传统手术组报告的并发症发生率相似。据报告,轻微和明显的疼痛在冷冻疗法组中更常见,而剧烈疼痛在对照组中更常见。然而,作者未报告这些差异是否具有显著性。未观察到与干预相关的死亡和胆汁漏。

作者结论

基于一项偏倚风险高的随机临床试验,没有足够的证据得出结论:对于来自各种原发部位的肝转移患者,与传统手术相比,冷冻疗法在生存或复发方面是否带来任何显著益处。此外,与不干预相比,没有证据表明冷冻疗法有效。目前,在随机临床试验之外不推荐使用冷冻疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验