• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生以患者为中心观察的可靠性。

Reliability in patient-centered observations of family physicians.

作者信息

Chesser Amy, Reyes Jared, Woods Nikki Keene, Williams Kim, Kraft Robert

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS 67214-3199, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):428-32.

PMID:23743944
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patient-centered communication is an important component of primary care and related to improved patient health outcomes and satisfaction. The Patient-Centered Observation Form (PCOF) was developed as an educational assessment tool to improve resident physician-patient communication. However, reliability of the tool has not been tested.

METHODS

Residents and patients were observed in routine medical encounters in a Midwestern family medicine residency center as part of a prospective, quasi-experimental study. Four independent observers (two faculty clinicians and two social scientists) used the PCOF to rate videorecorded patient encounters in the areas of establishing rapport, maintaining relationships, agenda setting, efficiency, information gathering, assessing patient perspectives, effective and open use of the electronic medical record (EMR), sharing information, discussion of behavior changes, co-creating a plan, and shared decision making.

RESULTS

A total of 13 physician-patient encounters were observed. Mean overall reliability for the PCOF was 0.67 using four raters, 0.45 for clinicians only, and 0.62 for social scientists. Adequate reliability (>0.7) was found for behavior change discussion (0.89) in clinician ratings but not with social scientists (0.62). Social scientists had adequate reliability in assessing patients' perspectives on health (0.86) and shared decision making (0.78), but these were not considered reliable among clinicians (0.46 and 0.00, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliability of the PCOF for assessing patient-centered competence is dependent on the content of communication being scored and the training history of the evaluator. These results challenge researchers and physicians to develop more reliable scoring instructions and tools for assessing patient-centered competence.

摘要

背景与目的

以患者为中心的沟通是初级医疗的重要组成部分,与改善患者健康结局及满意度相关。患者中心观察表(PCOF)作为一种教育评估工具而开发,用于改善住院医师与患者之间的沟通。然而,该工具的可靠性尚未得到测试。

方法

作为一项前瞻性、准实验研究的一部分,在中西部一家家庭医学住院医师培训中心的常规医疗问诊中观察住院医师和患者。四名独立观察者(两名临床教员和两名社会科学家)使用PCOF对视频记录的患者问诊在建立融洽关系、维持关系、议程设定、效率、信息收集、评估患者观点、有效及开放使用电子病历(EMR)、信息共享、行为改变讨论、共同制定计划和共同决策等方面进行评分。

结果

共观察了13次医患问诊。使用四名评分者时,PCOF的总体平均可靠性为0.67,仅临床医生评分时为0.45,社会科学家评分时为0.62。临床医生在行为改变讨论(0.89)评分中发现具有足够的可靠性(>0.7),但社会科学家的评分则不然(0.62)。社会科学家在评估患者对健康的观点(0.86)和共同决策(0.78)方面具有足够的可靠性,但在临床医生中这些评分被认为不可靠(分别为0.46和0.00)。

结论

PCOF评估以患者为中心能力的可靠性取决于所评分的沟通内容以及评估者的培训经历。这些结果促使研究人员和医生开发更可靠的评分指南和工具来评估以患者为中心的能力。

相似文献

1
Reliability in patient-centered observations of family physicians.家庭医生以患者为中心观察的可靠性。
Fam Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):428-32.
2
Seven Years of Teaching Communication With the Patient-Centered Observation Form.使用以患者为中心的观察表进行七年教学沟通
Fam Med. 2018 Feb;50(2):132-137. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.516713.
3
Can teaching agenda-setting skills to physicians improve clinical interaction quality? A controlled intervention.向医生传授议程设置技能能否提高临床互动质量?一项对照干预研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Jan 14;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-3.
4
Assessing patient-centered communication in a family practice setting: how do we measure it, and whose opinion matters?评估家庭医疗环境中的以患者为中心的沟通:我们如何衡量它,以及谁的意见重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.027. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
5
Does Family Medicine training in Thailand affect patient satisfaction with primary care doctors?泰国的家庭医学培训是否会影响患者对初级保健医生的满意度?
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 29;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-14.
6
Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters.电子病历的使用与医患沟通:一项关于以色列基层医疗问诊的观察性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Apr;61(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004.
7
Managing difficult encounters: understanding physician, patient, and situational factors.处理困难医患关系:理解医生、患者和情境因素。
Am Fam Physician. 2013 Mar 15;87(6):419-25.
8
Assessing culturally competent diabetes care with unannounced standardized patients.通过未事先通知的标准化患者评估具有文化胜任力的糖尿病护理。
Fam Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):400-8.
9
A practical assessment of physician biopsychosocial performance.医生生物心理社会表现的实践评估。
Med Teach. 2007 Oct;29(8):e219-26. doi: 10.1080/01421590701362492.
10
First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.一年级医学生对自身沟通技巧的评估:一种基于视频的开放式方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Gothenburg direct observation tool for assessing person-centred care (GDOT-PCC): evaluation of inter-rater reliability.用于评估以患者为中心护理的哥德堡直接观察工具(GDOT-PCC):评分者间信度评估
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e096576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096576.
2
Physician-patient agreement on physicians' communication skills and visit satisfaction in dermatology clinics: a one-with-many design.皮肤科诊所中医生与患者就医生沟通技巧和就诊满意度达成的共识:一种一对多设计。
Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Nov 10;10(1):68-81. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2021.110574. eCollection 2022.
3
Behavioural observation tool for patient involvement and collaboration in emergency care teams (PIC-ET-tool).
患者参与和协作在急诊医疗团队中的行为观察工具(PIC-ET 工具)。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 1;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00841-7.
4
Measurement of person-centred consultation skills among healthcare practitioners: a systematic review of reviews of validation studies.测量医疗从业者以患者为中心的咨询技能:验证研究的系统评价综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04184-6.
5
Observable indicators of person-centred care: an interview study with patients, relatives and professionals.以患者为中心的护理的可观察指标:一项对患者、亲属和专业人员的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e059308. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059308.
6
Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis.医生与患者沟通评估的方差分量:概化理论分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252968. eCollection 2021.
7
How to measure person-centred practice - An analysis of reviews of the literature.如何衡量以人为本的实践——对文献综述的分析
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 Mar 4;12(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2170.
8
Agreement between simulated patients and faculty: Assessment of communication skills during objective structured clinical examination.模拟患者与教员之间的一致性:客观结构化临床考试中沟通技能的评估
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Nov-Dec;35(6):1570-1574. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.6.1000.
9
Assessing patient-centred communication in teaching: a systematic review of instruments.评估教学中的以患者为中心的沟通:工具的系统评价。
Med Educ. 2017 Nov;51(11):1103-1117. doi: 10.1111/medu.13375. Epub 2017 Aug 1.