• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大 ICD 植入物测试程序登记(CREDIT):术中除颤测试的当前实践、风险和成本。

Canadian Registry of ICD Implant Testing procedures (CREDIT): current practice, risks, and costs of intraoperative defibrillation testing.

机构信息

The Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01616.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01616.x
PMID:19804544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty about the proper role of defibrillation testing (DT) at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion.

METHODS

A prospective registry was conducted at 13 sites in Canada between January 2006 and October 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To document the details of DT, the reasons for not conducting DT, and the costs and complications associated with DT.

RESULTS

DT was conducted at implantation in 230 of 361 patients (64%). DT was more likely to be conducted for new implants compared with impulse generator replacements (71% vs 32%, P = 0.0001), but was similar for primary and secondary prevention indications (64% vs 63%, P = NS). Among patients not having DT, the reason(s) given were: considered unnecessary (44%); considered unsafe, mainly due to persistent atrial fibrillation (37%); lack of an anesthetist (20%); and, patient or physician preference (6%). When performed, DT consisted of a single successful shock > or = 10J below maximum device output in 65% of cases. A 10J safety-margin was met by 97% of patients, requiring system modification in 2.3%. Major perioperative complications occurred in 4.4% of patients having DT versus 6.6% of patients not having DT (P = NS). ICD insertion was $844 more expensive for patients having DT (P = 0.16), largely due to increased costs ($28,017 vs $24,545) among patients having impulse generator replacement (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

DT was not performed in a third of ICD implants, usually due to a perceived lack of need or relative contraindication.

摘要

背景

在植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 植入时,除颤测试 (DT) 的适当作用尚不确定。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月期间,在加拿大的 13 个地点进行了一项前瞻性登记。

目的

记录 DT 的详细信息、不进行 DT 的原因以及与 DT 相关的成本和并发症。

结果

在 361 名患者中的 230 名(64%)在植入时进行了 DT。与脉冲发生器更换相比,新植入物更有可能进行 DT(71%比 32%,P=0.0001),但与原发性和继发性预防指征相似(64%比 63%,P=NS)。在未进行 DT 的患者中,给出的原因包括:认为不必要(44%);认为不安全,主要是由于持续性心房颤动(37%);缺乏麻醉师(20%);以及患者或医生的偏好(6%)。当进行 DT 时,在 65%的情况下,单次成功电击大于或等于设备输出最大值以下 10J。97%的患者满足 10J 的安全裕度,需要修改系统的占 2.3%。在进行 DT 的患者中,有 4.4%发生主要围手术期并发症,而未进行 DT 的患者中,有 6.6%发生(P=NS)。进行 DT 的患者 ICD 植入费用增加了 844 美元(P=0.16),这主要是由于脉冲发生器更换患者的费用增加(28017 美元比 24545 美元,P=0.02)。

结论

三分之一的 ICD 植入术未进行 DT,通常是因为认为没有必要或存在相对禁忌症。

相似文献

1
Canadian Registry of ICD Implant Testing procedures (CREDIT): current practice, risks, and costs of intraoperative defibrillation testing.加拿大 ICD 植入物测试程序登记(CREDIT):术中除颤测试的当前实践、风险和成本。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01616.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
2
Defibrillation testing at the time of ICD insertion: an analysis from the Ontario ICD Registry.在 ICD 植入时进行除颤测试:安大略 ICD 登记处的分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;21(12):1344-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01850.x.
3
Defibrillation testing: the need for a definitive trial.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):183-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01620.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
4
Defibrillation testing at the time of implantation of cardioverter defibrillator in the clinical practice: a nation-wide survey.
Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):540-3. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum083. Epub 2007 May 16.
5
Patient, physician, and procedural factors influencing the use of defibrillation testing during initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion: findings from the NCDR®.影响首次植入式心脏复律除颤器植入过程中除颤测试使用的患者、医生及操作因素:来自国家心血管数据注册库(NCDR®)的研究结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;36(12):1522-31. doi: 10.1111/pace.12248. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion: do we really need it?在植入式心脏复律除颤器插入术中进行术中除颤阈值测试:我们真的需要吗?
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.031.
7
[Is DFT testing still mandatory?].
Herz. 2005 Nov;30(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2746-x.
8
Clinical evaluation of defibrillation testing in an unselected population of 2,120 consecutive patients undergoing first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant.对 2120 例连续首次植入植入式心脏复律除颤器患者进行去纤颤测试的临床评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 11;60(11):981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
A Comparison of ICD implantations in the United States versus Italy.美国与意大利植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入情况的比较。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S143-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00625.x.
10
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入测试的困境
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Defibrillation Threshold Testing After ICD Implantation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者植入植入式心律转复除颤器后除颤阈值测试
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Jun;14(2):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00403-x. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Outcome and safety of intraoperative defibrillation testing during device replacement: the Simpler trial.装置更换期间术中除颤测试的结果和安全性:Simpler 试验。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):956-960. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac282.
3
Critical analysis of ineffective post implantation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-testing.
植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后无效测试的批判性分析
World J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 26;9(2):167-173. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167.
4
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2015年心脏节律学会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心脏电生理和心脏起搏学会关于植入式心脏复律除颤器最佳程控与测试的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2016 Feb;32(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的术中除颤测试及临床电击疗效:北欧植入式心脏复律除颤器随机临床试验
Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2500-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv292. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.未进行术中测试的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入术不会增加系统修改率,也不会损害随访中测试的除颤效果。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?如何处理植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者的高除颤阈值:这真的重要吗?
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013 Aug;15(4):497-505. doi: 10.1007/s11936-013-0244-7.
8
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.双线圈与单线圈植入式除颤器导线:文献回顾。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
9
[Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].[术中植入式心律转复除颤器测试是否仍有必要?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010 Jun;21(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-010-0080-3.