Hassanien Mohammed Ahmed
Medical Education and Clinical Biochemistry Departments, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Oct 26;2:215-9. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S25276. Print 2011.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) involves approaching a clinical problem using a four-step method: (1) formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's problem, (2) search the literature for relevant clinical articles, (3) evaluate (critically appraise) the evidence for its validity and usefulness, (4) implement useful findings into clinical practice. EBM has now been incorporated as an integral part of the medical curriculum in many faculties of medicine around the world. The Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, started its process of curriculum reform and introduction of the new curriculum 4 years ago. One of the most characteristic aspects of this curriculum is the introduction of special study modules and electives as a student-selected component in the fourth year of study; the Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine course was included as one of these special study modules. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the EBM skills of medical students after completing the course and their perceptions of the faculty member delivering the course and organization of the course.
The EBM course was held for the first time as a special study module for fourth-year medical students in the first semester of the academic year 2009-2010. Fifteen students were enrolled in this course. At the end of the course, students anonymously evaluated aspects of the course regarding their EBM skills and course organization using a five- point Likert scale in response to an online course evaluation questionnaire. In addition, students' achievement was evaluated with regard to the skills and competencies taught in the course.
Medical students generally gave high scores to all aspects of the EBM course, including course organization, course delivery, methods of assessment, and overall. Scores were also high for students' self-evaluation of skill level and EBM experience. The results of a faculty member's evaluation of the students' achievement showed an average total percentage (92.2%) for all EBM steps.
The EBM course at the Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, is useful for familiarizing medical students with the basic principles of EBM and to help them in answering routine questions of clinical interest in a systematic way. In light of the results obtained from implementing this course with a small number of students, and as a student-selected component, the author believes integrating EBM longitudinally throughout the curriculum would be beneficial for King Abdulaziz University medical students. It would provide a foundation of knowledge, offer easy access to resources, promote point-of-care and team learning, help students to develop applicable skills for lifelong learning, and help the faculty to achieve its goals of becoming more student-centered and encouraging students to employ more self-directed learning strategies.
循证医学(EBM)涉及采用四步法处理临床问题:(1)根据患者问题提出清晰的临床问题;(2)检索文献以查找相关临床文章;(3)评估(严格评价)证据的有效性和实用性;(4)将有用的研究结果应用于临床实践。如今,循证医学已成为全球许多医学院校医学课程的一个组成部分。阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院于4年前启动了课程改革并引入了新课程。该课程最具特色的方面之一是在第四学年引入了特殊学习模块和选修课作为学生自主选择的部分;循证医学导论课程就是这些特殊学习模块之一。本文旨在评估医学生完成该课程后的循证医学技能,以及他们对授课教师和课程组织的看法。
循证医学课程于2009 - 2010学年第一学期首次作为四年级医学生的特殊学习模块开设。15名学生注册了该课程。课程结束时,学生通过在线课程评估问卷,使用五点李克特量表对课程在循证医学技能和课程组织方面的各个方面进行匿名评估。此外,还评估了学生在课程所教授的技能和能力方面的成绩。
医学生对循证医学课程的各个方面,包括课程组织、授课方式、评估方法以及整体情况,普遍给予高分。学生对自身技能水平和循证医学经验的自我评估得分也很高。教师对学生成绩的评估结果显示,所有循证医学步骤的平均总百分比为92.2%。
阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院的循证医学课程有助于医学生熟悉循证医学的基本原则,并帮助他们以系统的方式回答临床关注的常规问题。鉴于在少数学生中实施该课程以及作为学生自主选择部分所获得的结果,作者认为在整个课程中纵向整合循证医学对阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学的医学生将是有益的。这将提供知识基础,便于获取资源,促进床边护理和团队学习,帮助学生培养终身学习的应用技能,并帮助教师实现更加以学生为中心以及鼓励学生采用更多自主学习策略的目标。