• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[同种异体肌腱固定与螺钉固定在跖跗关节韧带损伤中的比较:生物力学分析]

[Comparison between allogeneic tendon fixation and screw fixation in ligamentous Lisfranc injury: a biomechanical analysis].

作者信息

Wen Yi, Feng Pin, Zhang Hui, Tu Chong-Qi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Mar;44(2):222-5, 241.

PMID:23745260
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the stability provided by a allogeneic tendon with a screw for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were loaded in the condition of Lisfranc ligament-intact, injury and fixation models. With axial or abduction stress, the distance between medial cuneiform and second metatarsal was recorded.

RESULTS

With both two types of stress, there were statistically significant differences in motion detected between the intact and post-injury conditions (all P = 0.000), and the magnitudes were greater with abduction [(4.14 +/- 1.02) mm] than axial load [(1.60 +/- 0.64) mm]. In screw fixation group, the mean position changes under axial load and abduction load were (1.53 +/- 0.62) mm and (4.06 +/- 1.05) mm in post-injury model respectively, while the changes were (0.76 +/- 0.35) mm and (1.20 +/- 0.53) mm in the fixation model (all P = 0.000) which were not statistical different to that in the intact model. In allogeneic tendon fixation group, the mean position changes were (1.66 +/- 0.65) mm and (4.21 +/- 1.00) mm in the post-injury model, while were (0.90 +/- 0.41) mm and (1.33 +/- 0.61) mm in the fixation model (all P = 0.000) which also were not statistical different to that in the intact model.

CONCLUSION

Under abduction stress, a significantly greater difference was found between pre- and post-injury, which may be valuable for diagnosing and testing ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Allogeneic tendon fixation can provide similar stability as screw fixation in ligamentous Lisfranc injury.

摘要

目的

比较同种异体肌腱联合螺钉治疗Lisfranc韧带损伤的稳定性。

方法

对6对新鲜冷冻尸体足进行Lisfranc韧带完整、损伤及固定模型加载。施加轴向或外展应力,记录内侧楔骨与第二跖骨之间的距离。

结果

在两种应力作用下,完整状态与损伤后状态之间检测到的运动差异具有统计学意义(所有P = 0.000),外展时的位移幅度[(4.14±1.02)mm]大于轴向载荷[(1.60±0.64)mm]。在螺钉固定组中,损伤后模型在轴向载荷和外展载荷下的平均位置变化分别为(1.53±0.62)mm和(4.06±1.05)mm,而在固定模型中变化分别为(0.76±0.35)mm和(1.20±0.53)mm(所有P = 0.000),与完整模型相比无统计学差异。在同种异体肌腱固定组中,损伤后模型的平均位置变化分别为(1.66±0.65)mm和(4.21±1.00)mm,而在固定模型中分别为(0.90±0.41)mm和(1.33±0.61)mm(所有P = 0.000),与完整模型相比也无统计学差异。

结论

在外展应力下,损伤前后差异明显增大,这可能对诊断和检测Lisfranc韧带损伤具有重要价值。同种异体肌腱固定在Lisfranc韧带损伤中可提供与螺钉固定相似的稳定性。

相似文献

1
[Comparison between allogeneic tendon fixation and screw fixation in ligamentous Lisfranc injury: a biomechanical analysis].[同种异体肌腱固定与螺钉固定在跖跗关节韧带损伤中的比较:生物力学分析]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Mar;44(2):222-5, 241.
2
Ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plate and transarticular screw fixation.跖跗关节韧带损伤:背侧钢板与经关节螺钉固定的生物力学比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jun;26(6):462-73. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600607.
3
A biomechanical analysis of a tensioned suture device in the fixation of the ligamentous Lisfranc injury.一种张力缝线装置在韧带性 Lisfranc 损伤固定中的生物力学分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Apr;32(4):422-31. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0422.
4
Stability of Lisfranc injury fixation in Thiel Cadavers: Is routine fixation of the 1st and 3rd tarsometatarsal joint necessary?蒂尔尸体中 Lisfranc 损伤固定的稳定性:第 1 和第 3 跗跖关节的常规固定是否必要?
Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1764-1767. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
Biomechanical comparison of fixation stability using a Lisfranc plate versus transarticular screws.使用Lisfranc钢板与经关节螺钉固定稳定性的生物力学比较。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Feb;25(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.
7
Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dorsal Plate Fixation and Transarticular Screws.韧带性Lisfranc损伤:背侧板固定与经关节螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jul;33(7):e270-e275. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001466.
8
Biomechanical analysis of endobutton versus screw fixation after Lisfranc ligament complex sectioning.跟骨结节骨间韧带复合体切断后采用 Endobutton 与螺钉固定的生物力学分析
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Dec;19(4):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Biomechanical Comparison of Fiber Tape Device Versus Transarticular Screws for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Cadaveric Model.纤维带装置与经关节螺钉治疗跖跗关节韧带损伤的生物力学比较:尸体模型研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3299-3307. doi: 10.1177/03635465221118580. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
Allograft Reconstruction of the Lisfranc Ligament.Lisfranc韧带的同种异体移植重建
Foot Ankle Spec. 2015 Aug;8(4):292-6. doi: 10.1177/1938640015584768. Epub 2015 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical study on the surgical treatment of atypical Lisfranc joint complex injury.非典型Lisfranc关节复合体损伤手术治疗的临床研究
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Oct 6;8(19):4388-4399. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4388.