• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝切除术术后的专业化和利用。

Specialization and utilization after hepatectomy in academic medical centers.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Analysis & Research (SOAR), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.072. Epub 2013 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.072
PMID:23746763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4570249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Specialized procedures such as hepatectomy are performed by a variety of specialties in surgery. We aimed to determine whether variation exists among utilization of resources, cost, and patient outcomes by specialty, surgeon case volume, and center case volume for hepatectomy.

METHODS

We queried centers (n = 50) in the University Health Consortium database from 2007-2010 for patients who underwent elective hepatectomy in which specialty was designated general surgeon (n = 2685; 30%) or specialist surgeon (n = 6277; 70%), surgeon volume was designated high volume (>38 cases annually) and center volume was designated high volume (>100 cases annually). We then stratified our cohort by primary diagnosis, defined as primary tumor (n = 2241; 25%), secondary tumor (n = 5466; 61%), and benign (n = 1255; 14%).

RESULTS

Specialist surgeons performed more cases for primary malignancy (primary 26% versus 15%) while general surgeons operated more for secondary malignancies (67% versus 61%) and benign disease (18% versus 13%). Specialists were associated with a shorter total length of stay (LOS) (5 d versus 6 d; P < 0.01) and lower in-hospital morbidity (7% versus 11%; P < 0.01). Patients treated by high volume surgeons or at high volume centers were less likely to die than those treated by low volume surgeons or at low volume centers, (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.89) and (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.13-0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical specialization, surgeon volume and center volume may be important metrics for quality and utilization in complex procedures like hepatectomy. Further studies are necessary to link direct factors related to hospital performance in the changing healthcare environment.

摘要

背景

肝切除术等专业手术由多个外科专业进行。我们旨在确定专业、外科医生手术量和中心手术量是否会影响肝切除术的资源利用、成本和患者结局。

方法

我们在 2007 年至 2010 年期间从大学健康联盟数据库中查询了 50 个中心(n = 50),这些中心的患者接受了择期肝切除术,指定外科医生为普通外科医生(n = 2685;30%)或专科外科医生(n = 6277;70%),外科医生手术量被指定为高手术量(>38 例/年),中心手术量被指定为高手术量(>100 例/年)。然后,我们根据主要诊断对队列进行分层,主要诊断定义为原发性肿瘤(n = 2241;25%)、继发性肿瘤(n = 5466;61%)和良性疾病(n = 1255;14%)。

结果

专科外科医生对原发性恶性肿瘤的手术量更多(原发性 26%对 15%),而普通外科医生对继发性恶性肿瘤(67%对 61%)和良性疾病(18%对 13%)的手术量更多。专科医生的总住院时间(LOS)更短(5 天对 6 天;P < 0.01),住院并发症发生率更低(7%对 11%;P < 0.01)。与低手术量医生或低手术量中心相比,高手术量医生或高手术量中心治疗的患者死亡风险更低(OR 0.55;95%CI 0.33-0.89)和(OR 0.44;95%CI 0.13-0.56)。

结论

在肝切除术等复杂手术中,外科专业、外科医生手术量和中心手术量可能是质量和利用的重要指标。在不断变化的医疗环境下,需要进一步研究与医院绩效相关的直接因素,以确定其联系。

相似文献

1
Specialization and utilization after hepatectomy in academic medical centers.肝切除术术后的专业化和利用。
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.072. Epub 2013 May 21.
2
Is Annual Volume Enough? The Role of Experience and Specialization on Inpatient Mortality After Hepatectomy.年手术量足够吗?经验和专业化对肝切除术后住院死亡率的影响
Ann Surg. 2017 Oct;266(4):603-609. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002377.
3
The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer.医院规模和外科医生手术量对肝癌肝切除患者抢救失败的相对影响。
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1004-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
4
Improved outcomes for patients with cerebrovascular malformations at high-volume centers: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume in the United States, 2000-2009.高容量中心的脑血管畸形患者的治疗效果得到改善:2000-2009 年美国外科医生和医院容量的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):69-80. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS15925. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
5
Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in a community hospital: the importance of surgeon procedural volume in operative outcomes.社区医院肝细胞癌肝切除术:外科医生手术量对手术结果的重要性。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Mar-Apr;55(82-83):647-52.
6
Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery.肝胰胆(HPB)外科手术中的手术专业化与手术死亡率
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Sep;12(9):1534-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0566-z. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.学术医疗中心肥胖症手术的医院手术量与治疗结果之间的关系。
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):586-93; discussion 593-4. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000140752.74893.24.
8
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of academic setting and hospital volume on patient survival.肝细胞癌:学术背景和医院容量对患者生存的影响。
Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;31:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
9
Regional trends and the impact of various patient and hospital factors on outcomes and costs of hospitalization between academic and nonacademic centers after deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: a United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 2006 to 2010.2006 年至 2010 年美国全国住院患者样本分析:深脑刺激手术后帕金森病患者在学术和非学术中心的结局和住院费用的区域趋势及其受患者和医院因素的影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Nov;35(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.FOCUS13295.
10
The Impact of Physician Specialization on Clinical and Hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing EVAR and TEVAR.医师专业化对接受腔内血管修复术(EVAR)和胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)患者的临床及医院结局的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.01.025. Epub 2016 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes after major hepatectomy are acceptable in low-volume centers in the Caribbean.在加勒比地区的小容量中心,大肝切除术后的临床结果是可以接受的。
World J Hepatol. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):199-207. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.199.
2
Albumin-Bilirubin Score: Predicting Short-Term Outcomes Including Bile Leak and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure Following Hepatic Resection.白蛋白-胆红素评分:预测肝切除术后包括胆漏和肝切除术后肝功能衰竭在内的短期结局
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Feb;21(2):238-248. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3246-4. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Total Elbow Arthroplasty in the United States: Evaluation of Cost, Patient Demographics, and Complication Rates.美国全肘关节置换术:成本、患者人口统计学及并发症发生率评估
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2016 Mar 31;8(1):6113. doi: 10.4081/or.2016.6113. eCollection 2016 Mar 21.
4
Hospital Utilization of Nationally Shared Liver Allografts from 2007 to 2012.2007年至2012年全国共享肝脏移植供体的医院利用情况
World J Surg. 2016 Apr;40(4):958-66. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3357-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of hospital volume, residency, and fellowship training on perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy.医院容量、住院医师规范化培训和专科医师培训对根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):29.e13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.10.008. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
2
How small is too small? A systematic review of center volume and outcome after cardiac transplantation.多小算太小?心脏移植后中心容量与结局的系统评价。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Nov;5(6):783-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966630. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
3
The effect of hospital volume on patient outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis.医院容量对重症急性胰腺炎患者结局的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 17;12:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-112.
4
The association of hospital volume with rectal cancer surgery outcomes.医院手术量与直肠癌手术结果的关系。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Feb;28(2):191-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1536-1. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
5
Using hierarchical clustering of secreted protein families to classify and rank candidate effectors of rust fungi.利用分泌蛋白家族的层次聚类对锈菌候选效应子进行分类和排序。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029847. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
6
Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗食管旁疝的应用及疗效
Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1353-7.
7
Association between Leapfrog safe practices score and hospital mortality in major surgery.跳跃式安全实践评分与大手术院内死亡率的关系。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49(12):1082-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318238f26b.
8
Impact of center volume on outcomes of increased-risk liver transplants.中心容积对高危肝移植结局的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct;17(10):1191-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22343.
9
Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards.符合莱普戈夫(Leapfrog)容量结局标准的医院中食管切除术结局的变化。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Apr;91(4):1003-9; discussion 1009-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.006.
10
Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia.病情严重程度是否重要?腹腔镜食管肌切开术联合胃底折叠术与食管扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1466-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1415-1. Epub 2010 Oct 26.