Suppr超能文献

病情严重程度是否重要?腹腔镜食管肌切开术联合胃底折叠术与食管扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症的比较。

Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1466-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1415-1. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is scarce evidence regarding optimal treatment options for achalasia in patients with varying illness severity risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare outcomes with laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication (LM) and esophageal dilation (ED) for hospitalized patients with different illness severity.

METHODS

The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) is an alliance of more than 100 academic medical centers and nearly 200 affiliate hospitals. UHC's Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager (CDB/RM) allows member hospitals to compare patient-level risk-adjusted outcomes for performance improvement purposes. The CDB/RM was queried for patients with achalasia who underwent LM (n=1,390) or ED (n=492) during a 3-year period between 2006 and 2008.

RESULTS

Overall esophageal perforation rates were significantly higher for ED (0.4% LM vs. 2.4% ED; p<0.001). Patients undergoing LM with minor/moderate illness severity showed higher morbidity (9.42% LM vs. 5.15% ED; p<0.05). However, LM patients in this illness severity group showed significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (0.38% LM vs. 7.32% ED; p<0.001) and length of stay (2.23±1.78 LM vs. 4.88±4.42 days ED; p<0.001), but comparable cost ($9,539 LM vs. $8990 ED; p>0.05). In the major/extreme illness severity group mortality was comparable (1.37% LM vs. 2.44% ED; p>0.05). Overall morbidity was significantly greater in LM (50.48% LM vs. 19.57% ED; p<0.001). However, the length of stay was significantly increased in the ED group (8.96±7.86 LM vs. 11.72±11.05 days ED; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized patients with minor/moderate illness severity, laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia showed comparable or better outcomes than ED. For major/extreme illness severity, dilation showed comparable or better profile for hospitalized achalasia patients. These results highlight the importance and impact of illness severity on outcomes of achalasia patients.

摘要

简介

对于病情严重程度不同的贲门失弛缓症患者,最佳治疗选择的证据很少。本研究的目的是评估和比较不同病情严重程度的住院患者行腹腔镜食管肌切开术加胃底折叠术(LM)与食管扩张术(ED)的结局。

方法

联合保健组织(UHC)是一个由 100 多家学术医疗中心和近 200 家附属医院组成的联盟。UHC 的临床数据基础/资源管理系统(CDB/RM)允许成员医院为了提高绩效而比较患者层面的风险调整后结果。2006 年至 2008 年期间,CDB/RM 对接受 LM(n=1390)或 ED(n=492)治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者进行了为期 3 年的查询。

结果

ED 的食管穿孔总体发生率显著更高(0.4% LM 比 2.4% ED;p<0.001)。病情较轻/中度的行 LM 治疗的患者显示出更高的发病率(9.42% LM 比 5.15% ED;p<0.05)。然而,在这个病情严重程度组的 LM 患者中,30 天再入院率显著降低(0.38% LM 比 7.32% ED;p<0.001),住院时间缩短(2.23±1.78 LM 比 4.88±4.42 天 ED;p<0.001),但费用相当(9539 美元 LM 比 8990 美元 ED;p>0.05)。在主要/极端病情严重程度组,死亡率相当(1.37% LM 比 2.44% ED;p>0.05)。总体发病率在 LM 组中显著更高(50.48% LM 比 19.57% ED;p<0.001)。然而,ED 组的住院时间显著增加(8.96±7.86 LM 比 11.72±11.05 天 ED;p=0.04)。

结论

在病情较轻/中度的住院患者中,腹腔镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的结果与 ED 相当或更好。对于主要/极端病情严重程度的患者,扩张术在住院贲门失弛缓症患者中具有相当或更好的特征。这些结果强调了病情严重程度对贲门失弛缓症患者结局的重要性和影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验