Thomas Philip, Longden Eleanor
Department of Social Science and Humanities, University of Bradford, , Bradford, UK.
Med Humanit. 2013 Dec 1;39(2):119-25. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2012-010268. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
The dominance of technological paradigms within psychiatry creates moral and ethical tensions over how to engage with the interpersonal narratives of those experiencing mental distress. This paper argues that such paradigms are poorly suited for fostering principled responses to human suffering, and proposes an alternative approach that considers a view of relationships based in feminist theories about the nature of caring. Four primary characteristics are presented which distinguish caring from technological paradigms: (1) a concern with the particular nature of contexts, (2) embodied practice, (3) the dialogical basis of caring and (4) the existential basis of caring. From this we explore the role of the moral imagination and our ability, through narrative, to acknowledge, engage with and bear witness to the injustices that shape the lives of those who suffer. This, we argue, is at the heart of caring. Clinical implications are discussed, including an exposition of the importance of narrative in recovery from trauma and distress. Narrative Psychiatry, The Sanctuary Model of care, and Soteria, are outlined as examples of this type of practice.
精神病学中技术范式的主导地位,在如何应对精神痛苦者的人际叙事方面引发了道德和伦理紧张关系。本文认为,此类范式不太适合培养对人类痛苦的有原则回应,并提出了一种替代方法,该方法考虑基于女性主义关怀本质理论的关系观。文中呈现了四个将关怀与技术范式区分开来的主要特征:(1)对情境特殊性质的关注;(2)具身实践;(3)关怀的对话基础;(4)关怀的存在基础。据此,我们探讨道德想象力的作用,以及我们通过叙事来认识、应对并见证塑造受苦者生活的不公正现象的能力。我们认为,这是关怀的核心所在。文中讨论了临床意义,包括阐述叙事在创伤和痛苦恢复中的重要性。作为此类实践的例子,概述了叙事精神病学、关怀庇护所模式和索泰里亚。