Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (VIV), 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Sep;113(9):2331-41. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2669-9. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
Few studies have examined responsiveness of bioimpedance (BIA) to detect changes over time in body composition using a longitudinal design. Accuracy of BIA and skinfold thickness in estimating body composition among 39-64 year-old women was investigated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a criterion method both cross-sectionally and during a training intervention.
97 women had percentage of fat assessed using DXA, skinfolds and eight-polar BIA using multi-frequency current. Fat mass and lean mass were estimated by DXA and BIA. Measurements were performed before and after the 21-week training intervention.
At baseline relative to DXA, BIA under predicted percentage of fat (-6.50 %) and fat mass (-3.42 kg) and overestimated lean mass (3.18 kg) considerably. Also skinfold measurement under predicted percentage of fat compared to DXA, but the difference was smaller (-1.69 % units). Skinfold measurement overestimated percentage of fat at low values and underestimated at high values (r (2) = 0.535). A significant bias was detected between DXA and BIA's estimate of change in percentage of fat, fat mass and lean mass. Compared to DXA, BIA and skinfolds underestimated the training-induced positive changes in body composition.
BIA and skinfold methods compared to DXA are not interchangeable to quantify the percentage of fat, fat mass and lean mass at the cross-sectional design in middle-aged women. Moreover, exercise training-induced small changes in body composition cannot be detected with BIA or skinfold method, even though DXA was able to measure statistically significant within-group changes in body composition after training.
使用纵向设计,很少有研究检查生物阻抗(BIA)对随时间变化的身体成分的反应性。使用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)作为标准方法,分别在横断面和训练干预期间,研究了 BIA 和皮褶厚度在估计 39-64 岁女性身体成分方面的准确性。
97 名女性使用 DXA、皮褶和八极 BIA 测量多频电流评估体脂百分比。使用 DXA 和 BIA 估计脂肪量和瘦体重。测量在 21 周的训练干预前后进行。
与 DXA 相比,基线时 BIA 低估了体脂百分比(-6.50%)和脂肪量(-3.42 公斤),高估了瘦体重(3.18 公斤)。皮褶测量也低估了与 DXA 相比的体脂百分比,但差异较小(-1.69%单位)。皮褶测量在低值高估体脂百分比,在高值低估体脂百分比(r(2)=0.535)。在 DXA 和 BIA 估计体脂百分比、脂肪量和瘦体重的变化之间检测到显著的偏差。与 DXA 相比,BIA 和皮褶低估了身体成分训练引起的正向变化。
与 DXA 相比,BIA 和皮褶方法在中年女性的横断面设计中不能互换使用,以定量体脂百分比、脂肪量和瘦体重。此外,即使 DXA 能够测量训练后身体成分的统计学显著的组内变化,但 BIA 或皮褶方法无法检测到身体成分的运动训练诱导的微小变化。