Radua Joaquim, El-Hage Wissam, Monté Gemma C, Gohier Benedicte, Tropeano Maria, Phillips Mary L, Surguladze Simon A
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK, Department of Neuroimaging Research, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain, INSERM U930 ERL, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France, Département de Psychiatrie, CHU Angers, LPPL EA4638, Université Angers, Angers, France, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK, and Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GeorgiaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK, Department of Neuroimaging Research, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain, INSERM U930 ERL, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France, Département de Psychiatrie, CHU Angers, LPPL EA4638, Université Angers, Angers, France, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK, and Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK, Department of Neuroimaging Research, FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain, INSERM U930 ERL, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France, Département de Psychiatrie, CHU Angers, LPPL EA4638, Université Angers, Angers, France, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Psychological Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK, and Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Aug;9(8):1232-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst089. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
There have been several reports on the association between the Val(158)Met genetic polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene, as well as the serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4), and frontolimbic region volumes, which have been suggested to underlie individual differences in emotion processing or susceptibility to emotional disorders. However, findings have been somewhat inconsistent. This study used diffeomorphic anatomic registration through exponentiated Lie algebra (DARTEL) whole-brain voxel-based morphometry to study the genetic effects of COMT Val(158)Met and SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR, as well as their interaction, on the regional gray matter volumes of a sample of 91 healthy volunteers. An interaction of COMT Val(158)Met × SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR genotypes with gray matter volume was found in bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, hippocampus, vermis of cerebellum and right putamen/insula. In particular, the gray matter volume in these regions was smaller in individuals who were both COMT-Met and 5-HTTLPR-S carriers, or both COMT-Val and 5-HTTLPR-L homozygotes, as compared with individuals with intermediate combinations of alleles. The interaction of COMT Val(158)Met and SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR adds to the understanding of individual differences in emotion processing.
关于儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶(COMT)基因的Val(158)Met基因多态性以及血清素转运体基因(SLC6A4)的血清素转运体相关多态性区域(5-HTTLPR)与额边缘区域体积之间的关联,已有多篇报道,这些区域被认为是情绪加工个体差异或情绪障碍易感性的基础。然而,研究结果并不完全一致。本研究采用通过指数李代数(DARTEL)进行的全脑基于体素的形态测量法,研究COMT Val(158)Met和SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR的基因效应及其相互作用对91名健康志愿者样本区域灰质体积的影响。在双侧海马旁回、杏仁核、海马体、小脑蚓部和右侧壳核/脑岛中发现了COMT Val(158)Met×SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR基因型与灰质体积的相互作用。具体而言,与具有中等等位基因组合的个体相比,同时为COMT-Met和5-HTTLPR-S携带者,或同时为COMT-Val和5-HTTLPR-L纯合子的个体,这些区域的灰质体积较小。COMT Val(158)Met和SLC6A4 5-HTTLPR的相互作用有助于加深对情绪加工个体差异的理解。