• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜胃造瘘大口径软套管推切取出方法的可行性。

Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Hospital, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushyt, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;28(4):490-2. doi: 10.1177/0884533613486933. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1177/0884533613486933
PMID:23748739
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice for long-term nutrition in patients with longstanding eating difficulties due to pathological entities that impair swallowing. The feeding catheters are designed to be removed by external traction or by endoscopy.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of the cut-and-push method as a possible safe alternative to the pullout method for removal of soft PEG devices with a large caliber.

METHODS

Patients with 20 French (Fr) or larger soft PEG system were enrolled for PEG removal by the cut-and-push technique. The replacement catheters were 2 Fr larger than the original ones. Patients were observed at 24 and 72 hours via home nursing care and then weekly for 1 month for signs of intestinal obstruction, tube leakage, or blockage.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (52 men; mean age 67 years) underwent the procedure: 42 due to leakage and 37 due to blockage. Mean time before tube removal was 4.8 months (range, 3-8). PEG devices were 20 Fr and 24 Fr in 57 (72.2%) and 22 (27.8%) cases, respectively. Collection of the inner component from stool was reported within 48 hours in 63 cases (80%). No cases of intestinal obstruction or other severe adverse events due to the inner component being eliminated throughout the intestine were observed in any patient during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The cut-and-push method employed for removal of a soft PEG tube with a large caliber seems to be safe and can be performed when removal by external traction may determine the occurrence of peristomal complications or jeopardize PEG replacement.

摘要

简介

经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)是长期存在吞咽困难的患者的首选方法,这些患者由于病理实体而导致吞咽困难。喂养导管设计为通过外部牵引或内窥镜取出。

目的

评估切割和推送方法作为一种可能的安全替代拔出方法的可行性,用于移除大口径的软 PEG 装置。

方法

纳入 20 法国(Fr)或更大的软 PEG 系统的患者,通过切割和推送技术进行 PEG 切除。更换的导管比原来的大 2 Fr。通过家庭护理在 24 小时和 72 小时观察患者,然后在 1 个月内每周观察 1 个月,以观察肠梗阻、管漏或阻塞的迹象。

结果

79 例患者(52 例男性;平均年龄 67 岁)接受了该手术:42 例因泄漏,37 例因阻塞。平均拔管时间为 4.8 个月(范围,3-8)。PEG 装置分别为 20 Fr 和 24 Fr,分别为 57 例(72.2%)和 22 例(27.8%)。63 例(80%)在 48 小时内报告从粪便中收集到内管。在研究期间,没有任何患者因肠内消除内管而发生肠梗阻或其他严重不良事件。

结论

对于大口径软 PEG 管的移除,采用切割和推送方法似乎是安全的,当外部牵引可能导致造口并发症或危及 PEG 更换时,可以进行这种方法。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices.经皮内镜胃造瘘大口径软套管推切取出方法的可行性。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;28(4):490-2. doi: 10.1177/0884533613486933. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
2
The "cut and push" method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal in adult patients: the Ipswich experience.成人患者经皮内镜下胃造口管拔除的“切割与推送”方法:伊普斯威奇经验
Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Apr-May;24(2):281-3. doi: 10.1177/0884533608323420.
3
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to ovarian carcinoma.经皮内镜下胃造瘘管置入术在卵巢癌所致恶性肠梗阻患者中的应用
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Feb;96(2):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.058.
4
[Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with neurological diseases. Results of a prospective multicenter and international study].[神经疾病患者的经皮内镜下胃造口术。一项前瞻性多中心国际研究的结果]
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2004;34(3):127-32.
5
Complications of the cut-and-push technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal.经皮内镜胃造瘘管拔出的切割推送技术的并发症。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Jun;26(3):230-1. doi: 10.1177/0884533611405533. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
6
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement.经皮内镜下胃造口管置换术
Trop Doct. 2012 Apr;42(2):85. doi: 10.1258/td.2011.110200. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
7
Acceptability and outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement--patients' and care givers' perspectives.经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)置管的可接受性及结果——患者和护理人员的观点
BMC Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 24;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-6-37.
8
A simple method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal: "tie and retrograde pull".一种简单的经皮内镜胃造瘘管取出方法:“结扎和逆行牵拉”。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Aug;48(8):1810-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.077.
9
The buried bumper syndrome: the usefulness of retrieval PEG tubes in its management.埋藏式胃造口管综合征:回收式经皮内镜下胃造口管在其治疗中的应用价值
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;19(1):45-8.
10
[A simple method for removal of percutaneous endoscopically implanted gastrostomy tubes].[一种移除经皮内镜下植入胃造口管的简单方法]
Chirurg. 1996 May;67(5):552-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The "cut and push" method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is not safe in paediatric patients.经皮内镜胃造瘘管的“切割和推送”取出方法在儿科患者中不安全。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Nov 22;40(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05575-y.
2
Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.经皮内镜下胃造口术临床实践指南。
Gut Liver. 2024 Jan 15;18(1):10-26. doi: 10.5009/gnl230146. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.经皮内镜下胃造口术临床实践指南
Clin Endosc. 2023 Jul;56(4):391-408. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.062. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Prevention and management of minor complications in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.经皮内镜胃造口术的轻微并发症的预防和处理。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000975.
5
How replace the gastrostomy tube in children with extremely compromised general conditions.对于一般状况极差的儿童,如何更换胃造口管。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2019 Jan-Mar;16(1):38-39. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_100_17.
6
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management.经皮内镜下胃造口术:适应证、技术、并发症及处理
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7739-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739.