Suppr超能文献

经皮内镜胃造瘘大口径软套管推切取出方法的可行性。

Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Hospital, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushyt, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;28(4):490-2. doi: 10.1177/0884533613486933. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice for long-term nutrition in patients with longstanding eating difficulties due to pathological entities that impair swallowing. The feeding catheters are designed to be removed by external traction or by endoscopy.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of the cut-and-push method as a possible safe alternative to the pullout method for removal of soft PEG devices with a large caliber.

METHODS

Patients with 20 French (Fr) or larger soft PEG system were enrolled for PEG removal by the cut-and-push technique. The replacement catheters were 2 Fr larger than the original ones. Patients were observed at 24 and 72 hours via home nursing care and then weekly for 1 month for signs of intestinal obstruction, tube leakage, or blockage.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (52 men; mean age 67 years) underwent the procedure: 42 due to leakage and 37 due to blockage. Mean time before tube removal was 4.8 months (range, 3-8). PEG devices were 20 Fr and 24 Fr in 57 (72.2%) and 22 (27.8%) cases, respectively. Collection of the inner component from stool was reported within 48 hours in 63 cases (80%). No cases of intestinal obstruction or other severe adverse events due to the inner component being eliminated throughout the intestine were observed in any patient during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The cut-and-push method employed for removal of a soft PEG tube with a large caliber seems to be safe and can be performed when removal by external traction may determine the occurrence of peristomal complications or jeopardize PEG replacement.

摘要

简介

经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)是长期存在吞咽困难的患者的首选方法,这些患者由于病理实体而导致吞咽困难。喂养导管设计为通过外部牵引或内窥镜取出。

目的

评估切割和推送方法作为一种可能的安全替代拔出方法的可行性,用于移除大口径的软 PEG 装置。

方法

纳入 20 法国(Fr)或更大的软 PEG 系统的患者,通过切割和推送技术进行 PEG 切除。更换的导管比原来的大 2 Fr。通过家庭护理在 24 小时和 72 小时观察患者,然后在 1 个月内每周观察 1 个月,以观察肠梗阻、管漏或阻塞的迹象。

结果

79 例患者(52 例男性;平均年龄 67 岁)接受了该手术:42 例因泄漏,37 例因阻塞。平均拔管时间为 4.8 个月(范围,3-8)。PEG 装置分别为 20 Fr 和 24 Fr,分别为 57 例(72.2%)和 22 例(27.8%)。63 例(80%)在 48 小时内报告从粪便中收集到内管。在研究期间,没有任何患者因肠内消除内管而发生肠梗阻或其他严重不良事件。

结论

对于大口径软 PEG 管的移除,采用切割和推送方法似乎是安全的,当外部牵引可能导致造口并发症或危及 PEG 更换时,可以进行这种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验