Suppr超能文献

FVIIIra、CD15 和类胰蛋白酶在法医病理学中皮肤刺伤活力诊断中的表现。

FVIIIra, CD15, and tryptase performance in the diagnosis of skin stab wound vitality in forensic pathology.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, CHU Nancy, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Int J Legal Med. 2013 Sep;127(5):957-65. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0880-1. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Abstract

The timing of skin wounds is one of the most challenging problems in forensic pathology. In the first minutes or hours after infliction, histological examination fails to determine whether a wound was sustained before or after death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of three immunohistochemical markers (FVIIIra, CD15, and tryptase) for the interpretation of the timing of cutaneous stab wounds. We evaluated these markers in intravital wounds from autopsy cases (n = 12) and surgical specimens (n = 58). As controls, we used normal skin samples from autopsies (n = 8) and an original ex vivo surgical human model of recent postmortem wounds (n = 24). We found overexpression of FVIIIra in 100 % of vital wounds, but also in 53 % of the controls. The number of CD15-positive cells was higher in wound margins than in internal controls (p < 0.0001) and was significantly correlated with the time interval between incision and devascularization (p = 0.0005; minimal time for positivity, 9 min). Using the anti-tryptase antibody, we found that the mast cell degranulation rate was higher in wound margins (p < 0.0001) and correlated with the time interval (minimal time, 1 min). The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of vitality were respectively 100 and 47 % for FVIIIra, 47 and 100 % for CD15, and 60 and 100 % for tryptase. The inter-observer agreement coefficients were 0.68 for FVIIIra, 0.90 for CD15, and 0.46 for tryptase. Finally, we demonstrated that these markers were not reliable in putrefied or desiccated specimens. In conclusion, CD15 and tryptase, but not FVIIIra, may be useful markers for differentiating recent antemortem from postmortem injuries.

摘要

皮肤伤口的时间判断是法医病理学中最具挑战性的问题之一。在受伤后的最初几分钟或几小时内,组织学检查无法确定伤口是在生前还是死后造成的。本研究旨在评估三种免疫组织化学标志物(FVIIIra、CD15 和 类胰蛋白酶)在判断皮肤刺伤时间的应用。我们评估了来自尸检案例(n=12)和手术标本(n=58)的活体伤口中的这些标志物。作为对照,我们使用了来自尸检的正常皮肤样本(n=8)和原始的死后近期手术人类模型伤口(n=24)。我们发现,所有活体伤口均过度表达 FVIIIra,但对照组中也有 53%的伤口过度表达。与内部对照相比,伤口边缘的 CD15 阳性细胞数量更高(p<0.0001),且与切口与缺血之间的时间间隔呈显著相关性(p=0.0005;阳性的最短时间为 9 分钟)。使用抗类胰蛋白酶抗体,我们发现伤口边缘的肥大细胞脱颗粒率更高(p<0.0001),且与时间间隔呈相关性(最短时间为 1 分钟)。FVIIIra 对活力的诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 47%,CD15 为 47%和 100%,类胰蛋白酶为 60%和 100%。FVIIIra 的观察者间一致性系数为 0.68,CD15 为 0.90,类胰蛋白酶为 0.46。最后,我们证明这些标志物在腐败或干燥标本中不可靠。总之,CD15 和类胰蛋白酶,但不是 FVIIIra,可能是区分近期生前和死后损伤的有用标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验