Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物引起的便秘的药物治疗疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

1] Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK [2] Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1566-74; quiz 1575. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.169. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There has been no definitive synthesis of the evidence for any benefit of available pharmacological therapies in opioid-induced constipation (OIC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to address this deficit.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials through to December 2012 to identify placebo-controlled trials of μ-opioid receptor antagonists, prucalopride, lubiprostone, and linaclotide in the treatment of adults with OIC. No minimum duration of therapy was required. Trials had to report a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy, and data were pooled using a random effects model. Effect of pharmacological therapies was reported as relative risk (RR) of failure to respond to therapy, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of μ-opioid receptor antagonists, containing 4,101 patients, were identified. These were superior to placebo for the treatment of OIC (RR of failure to respond to therapy=0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.75). Methylnaltrexone (six RCTs, 1,610 patients, RR=0.66; 95% CI 0.54-0.84), naloxone (four trials, 798 patients, RR=0.64; 95% CI 0.56-0.72), and alvimopan (four RCTs, 1,693 patients, RR=0.71; 95% CI 0.65-0.78) were all superior to placebo. Total numbers of adverse events, diarrhea, and abdominal pain were significantly commoner when data from all RCTs were pooled. Reversal of analgesia did not occur more frequently with active therapy. Only one trial of prucalopride was identified, with a nonsignificant trend toward higher responder rates with active therapy. Two RCTs of lubiprostone were found, with significantly higher responder rates with lubiprostone in both, but reporting of data precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

μ-Opioid receptor antagonists are safe and effective for the treatment of OIC. More data are required before the role of prucalopride or lubiprostone in the treatment of OIC are clear.

摘要

目的

目前还没有对阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC)可用药物治疗的任何益处进行综合评估。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析来解决这一不足。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、EMBASE Classic 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,以查找治疗 OIC 的 μ-阿片受体拮抗剂、普芦卡必利、鲁比前列酮和利那洛肽的安慰剂对照试验,检索时间截至 2012 年 12 月。研究无最低治疗持续时间的要求。试验必须报告对治疗的整体反应的二分类评估,且使用随机效应模型对数据进行合并。药物治疗的效果以无治疗反应的失败率的相对风险(RR)表示,置信区间(CI)为 95%。

结果

确定了 14 项关于 μ-阿片受体拮抗剂的合格随机对照试验(RCT),包含 4101 名患者。与安慰剂相比,这些药物在治疗 OIC 方面更有效(无治疗反应的失败率 RR=0.69;95%CI 0.63-0.75)。美沙酮(6 项 RCT,1610 名患者,RR=0.66;95%CI 0.54-0.84)、纳洛酮(4 项试验,798 名患者,RR=0.64;95%CI 0.56-0.72)和阿洛司琼(4 项 RCT,1693 名患者,RR=0.71;95%CI 0.65-0.78)均优于安慰剂。当合并所有 RCT 的数据时,总的不良事件、腹泻和腹痛更为常见。积极治疗并没有更频繁地出现镇痛作用逆转。仅发现一项普芦卡必利的试验,但有阳性治疗反应率较高的趋势,但数据报告妨碍了荟萃分析。

结论

μ-阿片受体拮抗剂治疗 OIC 安全有效。在明确普芦卡必利或鲁比前列酮在 OIC 治疗中的作用之前,还需要更多的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验