Center of Mitochondrial and Epigenomic Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Colket Translational Research Building, Room 6060, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4302, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 10;368(1622):20120267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0267. Print 2013 Jul 19.
Two major inconsistencies exist in the current neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory that random chromosomal mutations acted on by natural selection generate new species. First, natural selection does not require the evolution of ever increasing complexity, yet this is the hallmark of biology. Second, human chromosomal DNA sequence variation is predominantly either neutral or deleterious and is insufficient to provide the variation required for speciation or for predilection to common diseases. Complexity is explained by the continuous flow of energy through the biosphere that drives the accumulation of nucleic acids and information. Information then encodes complex forms. In animals, energy flow is primarily mediated by mitochondria whose maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) codes for key genes for energy metabolism. In mammals, the mtDNA has a very high mutation rate, but the deleterious mutations are removed by an ovarian selection system. Hence, new mutations that subtly alter energy metabolism are continuously introduced into the species, permitting adaptation to regional differences in energy environments. Therefore, the most phenotypically significant gene variants arise in the mtDNA, are regional, and permit animals to occupy peripheral energy environments where rarer nuclear DNA (nDNA) variants can accumulate, leading to speciation. The neutralist-selectionist debate is then a consequence of mammals having two different evolutionary strategies: a fast mtDNA strategy for intra-specific radiation and a slow nDNA strategy for speciation. Furthermore, the missing genetic variation for common human diseases is primarily mtDNA variation plus regional nDNA variants, both of which have been missed by large, inter-population association studies.
当前的新达尔文主义进化理论存在两个主要的不一致之处,即随机的染色体突变在自然选择的作用下产生新物种。首先,自然选择并不需要进化出越来越复杂的东西,但这是生物学的标志。其次,人类染色体 DNA 序列变异主要是中性的或有害的,不足以提供物种形成或常见疾病易感性所需的变异。复杂性是由能量在生物圈中的连续流动所解释的,这种流动驱动着核酸和信息的积累。信息随后编码复杂的形式。在动物中,能量流主要是由线粒体介导的,线粒体的母系遗传线粒体 DNA(mtDNA)为能量代谢的关键基因编码。在哺乳动物中,mtDNA 的突变率非常高,但卵巢选择系统会清除有害突变。因此,不断有微妙改变能量代谢的新突变被引入物种中,从而允许对能量环境的区域差异进行适应。因此,最具表型意义的基因变体出现在 mtDNA 中,具有区域性,并允许动物占据核 DNA(nDNA)变体更稀少的外围能量环境,从而导致物种形成。中性选择主义的争论是哺乳动物具有两种不同进化策略的结果:一种是快速的 mtDNA 策略,用于种内辐射,另一种是缓慢的 nDNA 策略,用于物种形成。此外,常见人类疾病的遗传变异主要是 mtDNA 变异加上区域性 nDNA 变体,这两种变异都被大型的、跨人群的关联研究所忽略。