Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 May;5(2):179-86. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.179. Epub 2013 May 30.
One of the most important factors in evaluating the quality of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is their gap. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal and internal gap of two different metal-ceramic crowns, casting and selective laser sintering (SLS), before and after porcelain firing. Furthermore, this study evaluated whether metal-ceramic crowns made using the SLS have the same clinical acceptability as crowns made by the traditional casting.
The 10 study models were produced using stone. The 20 specimens were produced using the casting and the SLS methods; 10 samples were made in each group. After the core gap measurements, 10 metal-ceramic crowns in each group were finished using the conventional technique of firing porcelain. The gap of the metal-ceramic crowns was measured. The marginal and internal gaps were measured by two-dimensional and three-dimensional replica techniques, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and nonparametric ANCOVA were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).
In both groups, the gap increased after completion of the metal-ceramic crown compared to the core. In all measured areas, the gap of the metal cores and metal-ceramic crowns produced by the SLS was greater than that of the metal cores and metal-ceramic crowns produced using the casting. Statistically significant differences were found between cast and SLS (metal cores and metal-ceramic crown).
Although the gap of the FDPs produced by the SLS was greater than that of the FDPs produced by the conventional casting in all measured areas, none exceeded the clinically acceptable range.
评估固定义齿(FDP)质量的最重要因素之一是其间隙。本研究的目的是比较两种不同金属陶瓷冠(铸造和选择性激光烧结(SLS))在瓷烧前后的边缘和内部间隙。此外,本研究评估了使用 SLS 制造的金属陶瓷冠是否与传统铸造的冠具有相同的临床可接受性。
使用石制作了 10 个研究模型。使用铸造和 SLS 方法制作了 20 个样本;每组 10 个样本。在核心间隙测量后,每组中的 10 个金属陶瓷冠都采用常规的烧瓷技术进行完成。测量金属陶瓷冠的间隙。使用二维和三维复制技术分别测量金属陶瓷冠的边缘和内部间隙。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和非参数协方差分析进行统计分析(α=.05)。
在两组中,与核心相比,金属陶瓷冠完成后间隙增加。在所有测量区域中,SLS 制造的金属基底和金属陶瓷冠的间隙大于铸造制造的金属基底和金属陶瓷冠的间隙。铸造和 SLS(金属基底和金属陶瓷冠)之间存在统计学显著差异。
尽管在所有测量区域中,SLS 制造的 FDP 的间隙都大于传统铸造制造的 FDP 的间隙,但没有一个超过临床可接受范围。