Corresponding author: Seth A. Berkowitz,
Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):3093-9. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0570. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
We sought to determine whether food insecurity is associated with worse glycemic, cholesterol, and blood pressure control in adults with diabetes.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from participants of the 1999-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. All adults with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) by self-report or diabetes medication use were included. Food insecurity was measured by the Adult Food Security Survey Module. The outcomes of interest were proportion of patients with HbA1c>9.0% (75 mmol/mol), LDL cholesterol>100 mg/dL, and systolic blood pressure>140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure>90 mmHg. We used multivariable logistic regression for analysis.
Among the 2,557 adults with diabetes in our sample, a higher proportion of those with food insecurity (27.0 vs. 13.3%, P<0.001) had an HbA1c>9.0% (75 mmol/mol). After adjustment for age, sex, educational attainment, household income, insurance status and type, smoking status, BMI, duration of diabetes, diabetes medication use and type, and presence of a usual source of care, food insecurity remained significantly associated with poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR] 1.53 [95% CI 1.07-2.19]). Food insecurity was also associated with poor LDL control before (68.8 vs. 49.8, P=0.002) and after (1.86 [1.01-3.44]) adjustment. Food insecurity was not associated with blood pressure control.
Food insecurity is significantly associated with poor metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Interventions that address food security as well as clinical factors may be needed to successfully manage chronic disease in vulnerable adults.
我们旨在探究食物不安全是否与糖尿病患者血糖、胆固醇和血压控制更差有关。
我们对 1999-2008 年全国健康与营养调查参与者的数据进行了横断面分析。所有通过自我报告或使用糖尿病药物确诊的 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者均纳入本研究。通过成人食物安全调查模块来衡量食物不安全情况。感兴趣的结局包括 HbA1c>9.0%(75mmol/mol)、LDL 胆固醇>100mg/dL、收缩压>140mmHg 或舒张压>90mmHg 的患者比例。我们使用多变量逻辑回归进行分析。
在我们样本中,2557 名患有糖尿病的成年人中,食物不安全者(27.0%比 13.3%,P<0.001)中 HbA1c>9.0%(75mmol/mol)的比例更高。在调整了年龄、性别、教育程度、家庭收入、保险状况和类型、吸烟状况、BMI、糖尿病病程、糖尿病药物使用和类型以及是否有常规医疗来源后,食物不安全与较差的血糖控制仍显著相关(比值比 [OR] 1.53 [95% CI 1.07-2.19])。在调整前(68.8%比 49.8%,P=0.002)和调整后(1.86 [1.01-3.44]),食物不安全与较差的 LDL 控制均相关。食物不安全与血压控制无关。
食物不安全与糖尿病成人代谢控制不良显著相关。为了成功管理弱势群体的慢性疾病,可能需要针对食物安全和临床因素的干预措施。