Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
N C Med J. 2023 Sep;85(1):70-76. doi: 10.18043/001c.88084.
Little is known about the differing impacts of food insecurity on HbA1c by race in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Predictions around increased food insecurity from COVID-19 exacerbating racial disparities led us to estimate its prevalence and associations with HbA1c by race during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data came from medical records and surveys among a clinic-based sample of T2D patients. Linear regression models estimated associations between food insecurity and HbA1c and between change in food insecurity and change in HbA1c. Likelihood ratio tests and examination of stratum-specific estimates assessed effect modification by race.
Our sample was 59% White, 59% female, and mean age was 60.8 ± 12.6. During the pandemic, food insecurity prevalence and HbA1c were significantly (p < .05) higher among non-Whites (39%, 8.4% ± 2.1) compared to Whites (15%, 7.8% ±1.6). HbA1c among those who were very food insecure was 1.00% (95% CI: 0.222, 1.762, p = .01) higher than those who were food secure. Those with increased food insecurity had a 0.58% (95% CI: 0.024, 1.128, p = .04) higher HbA1c increase than among those experiencing no change. No effect modification was detected.
Convenience sampling in an endocrinology clinic, recall bias, and inadequate power may underlie null effect modification results.
Although effect modification was not detected, racial disparities in HbA1c and food insecurity warrant further investigation. These disparities, combined with the significant impact of food insecurity on HbA1c, suggest that prioritization of resources to high-risk populations should be considered early during public emergencies to minimize short- and long-term health consequences.
关于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)中种族对血红蛋白 A1c 的不同影响的食物不安全感知之甚少。由于 COVID-19 加剧了种族差异,预计食物不安全感会增加,这促使我们在 COVID-19 大流行期间估计其患病率以及与种族的血红蛋白 A1c 的关联。
数据来自基于诊所的 T2D 患者的病历和调查。线性回归模型估计了食物不安全感与血红蛋白 A1c 之间以及食物不安全感变化与血红蛋白 A1c 变化之间的关联。似然比检验和分层特定估计值的检查评估了种族的效应修饰。
我们的样本中有 59%是白人,59%是女性,平均年龄为 60.8±12.6 岁。在大流行期间,非白人(39%,8.4%±2.1)的食物不安全感患病率和血红蛋白 A1c 明显(p<.05)高于白人(15%,7.8%±1.6)。非常食物不安全的人的血红蛋白 A1c 比食物安全的人高 1.00%(95%CI:0.222,1.762,p=.01)。食物不安全感增加的人血红蛋白 A1c 增加了 0.58%(95%CI:0.024,1.128,p=.04),比没有变化的人高。未检测到效应修饰。
内分泌诊所的便利抽样、回忆偏倚和能力不足可能是导致无效效应修饰结果的原因。
尽管没有检测到效应修饰,但血红蛋白 A1c 和食物不安全感方面的种族差异值得进一步调查。这些差异,加上食物不安全感对血红蛋白 A1c 的重大影响,表明在公共紧急情况下,应优先考虑高危人群的资源,以尽量减少短期和长期的健康后果。