• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验丰富消防员特隆赫姆消防测试的能量消耗。

Energy cost of the Trondheim firefighter test for experienced firefighters.

机构信息

North-Trøndelag University College, Levanger, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(2):211-25. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076980.

DOI:10.1080/10803548.2013.11076980
PMID:23759192
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to measure aerobic demands of fire fighting activities including exercise in the heat.

METHODS

Twenty-two experienced firefighters performed the Trondheim test simulating fire fighting tasks including work in the heat. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), heart rate (HR) and ventilation were recorded continuously. Data were compared with results obtained during a treadmill test during which the participants were dressed as smoke divers.

RESULTS

The participants completed physical parts of the Trondheim test in ˜12 min (range: 7.5-17.4). Time to complete the test was closely related to the participant's VO2 max. HR of ˜170 beats/min and pulmonary ventilation of ˜100 L/min were higher than at lactate threshold (LT) during laboratory tests. VO2 averaged over the test's physical part was 35 ± 7 ml/min/kg, which was at the same or below the level corresponding to the participants' LT. Physically fit participants completed the test faster than less fit participants. Slower and physically less fit participants consumed more air and used more oxygen than faster and physically more fit participants.

CONCLUSION

The Trondheim test is physically demanding; it distinguishes physically fit and less fit participants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测量包括热环境下作业在内的消防活动的有氧运动需求。

方法

22 名经验丰富的消防员进行了特隆赫姆测试,模拟了包括热环境下作业在内的消防任务。连续记录最大摄氧量(VO2 max)、心率(HR)和通气量。将结果与在跑步机上进行的测试结果进行比较,在该测试中,参与者穿着潜水服。

结果

参与者在约 12 分钟内完成了特隆赫姆测试的体力部分(7.5-17.4 分钟)。完成测试的时间与参与者的 VO2 max 密切相关。HR 约为 170 次/分钟,肺通气量约为 100 L/分钟,高于实验室测试中的乳酸阈(LT)。测试体力部分的平均 VO2 为 35±7ml/min/kg,与参与者的 LT 水平相当或低于 LT 水平。体能较好的参与者比体能较差的参与者完成测试的速度更快。较慢和体能较差的参与者比较快和体能较好的参与者消耗更多的空气和氧气。

结论

特隆赫姆测试对身体要求较高;它可以区分体能较好和较差的参与者。

相似文献

1
Energy cost of the Trondheim firefighter test for experienced firefighters.经验丰富消防员特隆赫姆消防测试的能量消耗。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(2):211-25. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076980.
2
Performance on a work-simulating firefighter test versus approved laboratory tests for firefighters and applicants.在工作模拟消防员测试中的表现与消防员和申请人的经批准的实验室测试相比。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(2):227-43. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076981.
3
Validation of the firefighter WFI treadmill protocol for predicting VO2 max.消防员WFI跑步机方案用于预测最大摄氧量的验证
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Mar;65(2):143-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu189. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Energy cost and energy sources during a simulated firefighting activity.模拟消防活动中的能量消耗和能量来源。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Dec;24(12):3457-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b2c7ff.
5
Physiological response of high-level female judokas measured through laboratory and field tests. Retesting the validity of the Santos test.通过实验室和现场测试测量高水平女子柔道运动员的生理反应。重新检验桑托斯测试的有效性。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Jun;52(3):237-44.
6
Field tests for evaluating the aerobic work capacity of firefighters.评估消防员有氧工作能力的现场测试。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e68047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068047. Print 2013.
7
The steady-state load of five firefighting tasks.五项灭火任务的稳态负荷。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Mar;26(1):173-180. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1573013. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
8
A comparison of two physical ability tests for firefighters.两种消防员体能测试方法的比较。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(10):1558-68. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.821171. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
Determinants of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) in fire fighter testing.消防员测试中最大摄氧量(VO2 max)的决定因素。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):1063-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Physiological demands and physical performance determinants of a new firefighting simulation test.新的消防模拟测试的生理需求和身体表现决定因素。
Ergonomics. 2023 Dec;66(12):2012-2024. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2177354. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The ESA Parastronaut Feasibility Project: Investigating the Need and Contents of Physical Performance Tests for an Inclusive European Astronaut Corps.欧空局准宇航员可行性项目:调查面向包容性欧洲宇航员队伍的体能测试的必要性和内容
Sports Med. 2023 Nov;53(11):2267-2280. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01891-4. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Effects of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Musculoskeletal Health, and Physical Fitness on Occupational Performance in Firefighters-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心血管疾病危险因素、肌肉骨骼健康和体能对消防员职业表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911946.
3
Maximal Oxygen Consumption, Respiratory Volume and Some Related Factors in Fire-fighting Personnel.
消防员的最大耗氧量、呼吸量及一些相关因素
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Apr 13;8:25. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_299_16. eCollection 2017.