• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
External validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk stratification tool for deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery in a UK population.英国人群中心脏手术后胸外科医师协会深部胸骨伤口感染风险分层工具的外部有效性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):479-84. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt222. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
2
Risk factors and mortality associated with deep sternal wound infections following coronary bypass surgery with or without concomitant procedures in a UK population: a basis for a new risk model?英国人群中冠状动脉搭桥手术伴或不伴同期手术后继发深部胸骨伤口感染的危险因素及死亡率:一种新风险模型的基础?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;11(5):543-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.237883. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
3
Vancomycin Paste Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Cardiac Operations.万古霉素糊剂不能降低心脏手术后深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb;103(2):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
4
Prospective validation of a predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after routine bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.常规双侧胸廓内动脉移植术后深部胸骨伤口感染预测评分系统的前瞻性验证
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 May;22(5):606-11. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw016. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Does EuroSCORE predict length of stay and specific postoperative complications after cardiac surgery?欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)能否预测心脏手术后的住院时间及特定术后并发症?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jan;27(1):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.020.
6
A predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.双侧胸廓内动脉移植术后深部胸骨伤口感染的预测评分系统。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):910-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv208. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Comparison of the EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 risk tools.EuroSCORE II 与胸外科医师学会 2008 风险工具的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Dec;44(6):999-1005; discussion 1005. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt122. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
8
Procedure- and Hospital-Level Variation of Deep Sternal Wound Infection From All-Japan Registry.来自全日本注册研究的手术和医院层面的深部胸骨伤口感染的变异
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb;109(2):547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.076. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
9
Incidence of deep sternal wound infection is not reduced with autologous platelet rich plasma in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.在高危心脏手术患者中,自体富血小板血浆并不能降低深部胸骨伤口感染的发生率。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Apr;61(3):180-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304537. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
10
Development and Validation of a Stratification Tool for Predicting Risk of Deep Sternal Wound Infection after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at a Brazilian Hospital.巴西一家医院冠状动脉搭桥术后深部胸骨伤口感染风险预测分层工具的开发与验证
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-7. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a retrospective observational review of outcomes for patients diagnosed with thymomatous and non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.吉隆坡医院的单孔电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术:对诊断为胸腺瘤性和非胸腺瘤性重症肌无力患者的结局进行回顾性观察研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):7446-7457. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-830. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
2
A single-patient-use ECG system for cardiothoracic surgery admissions in the UK: A cost-consequence analysis.英国心胸外科入院患者单人次使用心电图系统:成本-后果分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1027977. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1027977. eCollection 2023.
3
Bayesian networks identify determinants of outcomes following cardiac surgery in a UK population.贝叶斯网络确定了英国人群心脏手术后结局的决定因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03100-6.
4
Parsimonious machine learning models to predict resource use in cardiac surgery across a statewide collaborative.用于预测全州范围内心脏手术资源使用情况的简约机器学习模型。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Apr 20;11:214-228. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.04.017. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Analysis of Risk Factors for Sternal Wound Infection After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后胸骨伤口感染的危险因素分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Sep 6;15:5249-5256. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S381422. eCollection 2022.
6
Performance of a novel risk model for deep sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting.新型冠状动脉旁路移植术后深部胸骨伤口感染风险模型的表现。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):15177. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19473-1.
7
Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Post-Surgical Mediastinitis in Adults Consensus Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular Infections (), the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery () and the Biomedical Research Centre Network for Respiratory Diseases ().成人术后纵隔炎的预防、诊断与管理:西班牙心血管感染学会()、西班牙胸心血管外科学会()及呼吸疾病生物医学研究中心网络()的共识指南
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5566. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235566.
8
A nomogram prediction model for sternal incision problems.胸骨切口问题预测模型的列线图
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):253-261. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13626. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Bilateral-pectoral major muscle advancement flap combined with vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.双侧胸大肌推进皮瓣联合负压封闭引流技术治疗心脏术后深部胸骨伤口感染
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 27;15(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01264-2.
10
Low-virulent chronic sternal osteomyelitis in children.儿童低毒力慢性胸骨骨髓炎
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Apr 30;26(2):296-300. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14215. eCollection 2018 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.在大数据集中标准化 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验的功效。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):67-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.5525. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
2
Calibration of the EuroSCORE II risk stratification model: is the Hosmer-Lemeshow test acceptable any more?欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)风险分层模型的校准:霍斯默-莱梅肖检验(Hosmer-Lemeshow test)还能被接受吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):206. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs346. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
How well calibrated is EuroSCORE II?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):208. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs349. Epub 2012 May 30.
4
EuroSCORE II, illum qui est gravitates magni observe.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II,用于观察重大风险情况。 不过你提供的原文似乎有些拼写错误或表述不太准确,正确的应该是“EuroSCORE II, which is used to observe the major risks.” 这样更符合正常的语句表达 。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):729-31. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs057. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
5
Risk factors for sternal wound infections and application of the STS score in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中胸骨伤口感染的危险因素及STS评分的应用
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):624-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20110054.
6
Risk factors and mortality associated with deep sternal wound infections following coronary bypass surgery with or without concomitant procedures in a UK population: a basis for a new risk model?英国人群中冠状动脉搭桥手术伴或不伴同期手术后继发深部胸骨伤口感染的危险因素及死亡率:一种新风险模型的基础?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;11(5):543-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.237883. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第3部分——瓣膜置换加冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第2部分——单纯瓣膜手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S23-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.056.
9
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第1部分——冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S2-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053.
10
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: introduction.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:引言。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.054.

英国人群中心脏手术后胸外科医师协会深部胸骨伤口感染风险分层工具的外部有效性。

External validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk stratification tool for deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery in a UK population.

作者信息

Kirmani Bilal H, Mazhar Khurum, Saleh Hesham Z, Ward Andrew N, Shaw Matthew, Fabri Brian M, Mark Pullan D

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;17(3):479-84. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt222. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivt222
PMID:23760358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3745138/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a devastating complication of cardiac surgery, with a historical incidence of 0.4-5%. Predicting which patients are at higher risk of infection may help instituting various preventive measures. Risk calculations for mortality have been used as surrogates to estimate the risk of deep sternal wound infection, with limited success. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 2008 Risk Calculator modelled the risk of DSWI for cardiac surgical patients, but it has not been validated since its publication. We sought to assess the external validity of the STS-estimated risk of DSWI in a United Kingdom (UK) population.

METHODS

Using our prospectively captured database, we retrospectively calculated the risk of DSWI for 14 036 patients undergoing valve, coronary artery bypass grafts or combined procedures between February 2001 and March 2010. DSWI was identified according to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention definition. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to test the performance of the model using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The calibration of the model was interrogated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for Goodness of Fit.

RESULTS

A total of 135 (0.95%) patients developed DSWI. Although there was a statistically significant difference in the calculated risk of patients who contracted DSWI (0.44% ± 0.01) vs those who did not (0.28% ± 0.00, P < 0.0001), the AUROC of 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.6522-0.7414) denoted a modest discriminatory power, with the Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit statistic (P < 0.001) suggesting poor calibration. A risk-adjusted modifier improved the calibration (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The STS risk calculator lacks adequate discriminatory power for estimating the isolated risk of developing deep sternal wound infection in a UK population. The discrimination is similar to the tool's validation c-statistic and may have a place in an integrated calculator.

摘要

目的

深部胸骨伤口感染(DSWI)是心脏手术的一种严重并发症,历史发生率为0.4%-5%。预测哪些患者感染风险较高可能有助于采取各种预防措施。死亡率风险计算已被用作估计深部胸骨伤口感染风险的替代指标,但成效有限。胸外科医师协会(STS)2008年风险计算器对心脏手术患者的DSWI风险进行了建模,但自发布以来尚未得到验证。我们试图评估STS估计的DSWI风险在英国人群中的外部有效性。

方法

利用我们前瞻性收集的数据库,我们回顾性计算了2001年2月至2010年3月期间接受瓣膜置换、冠状动脉旁路移植术或联合手术的14036例患者的DSWI风险。根据疾病控制与预防中心的定义确定DSWI。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,利用ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)来测试模型的性能。使用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验对模型的校准进行检验。

结果

共有135例(0.95%)患者发生DSWI。虽然发生DSWI的患者计算出的风险(0.44%±0.01)与未发生DSWI的患者(0.28%±0.00,P<0.0001)在统计学上有显著差异,但AUROC为0.699(95%置信区间:0.6522-0.7414)表明其鉴别能力一般,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计量(P<0.001)表明校准效果较差。风险调整修饰符改善了校准(P=0.08)。

结论

STS风险计算器在估计英国人群发生深部胸骨伤口感染的单独风险方面缺乏足够的鉴别能力。其鉴别能力与该工具的验证c统计量相似,可能在综合计算器中有一席之地。