• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择行动。

Choosing actions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA , USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 3;4:273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00273. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00273
PMID:23761769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3669743/
Abstract

Actions that are chosen have properties that distinguish them from actions that are not. Of the nearly infinite possible actions that can achieve any given task, many of the unchosen actions are irrelevant, incorrect, or inappropriate. Others are relevant, correct, or appropriate but are disfavored for other reasons. Our research focuses on the question of what distinguishes actions that are chosen from actions that are possible but are not. We review studies that use simple preference methods to identify factors that contribute to action choices, especially for object-manipulation tasks. We can determine which factors are especially important through simple behavioral experiments.

摘要

被选择的动作具有与未被选择的动作不同的特性。在几乎可以实现任何给定任务的无数可能动作中,许多未被选择的动作是不相关的、不正确的或不适当的。其他动作是相关的、正确的或适当的,但由于其他原因而不受青睐。我们的研究集中在一个问题上,即是什么区分了被选择的动作和可能的但未被选择的动作。我们回顾了使用简单偏好方法来识别有助于动作选择的因素的研究,特别是对于物体操作任务。我们可以通过简单的行为实验来确定哪些因素特别重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/543821d23090/fpsyg-04-00273-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/26e3f09da8d5/fpsyg-04-00273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/7852deba39a7/fpsyg-04-00273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/80e5ee737333/fpsyg-04-00273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/9edb31e8fbf8/fpsyg-04-00273-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/53b2bedb2421/fpsyg-04-00273-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/1e9707ecd50f/fpsyg-04-00273-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/14afdd862a9c/fpsyg-04-00273-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/cefcc2e114a9/fpsyg-04-00273-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/01076f05a76f/fpsyg-04-00273-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/f8066226fefb/fpsyg-04-00273-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/2120283f68f2/fpsyg-04-00273-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/fc023a8576cc/fpsyg-04-00273-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/543821d23090/fpsyg-04-00273-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/26e3f09da8d5/fpsyg-04-00273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/7852deba39a7/fpsyg-04-00273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/80e5ee737333/fpsyg-04-00273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/9edb31e8fbf8/fpsyg-04-00273-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/53b2bedb2421/fpsyg-04-00273-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/1e9707ecd50f/fpsyg-04-00273-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/14afdd862a9c/fpsyg-04-00273-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/cefcc2e114a9/fpsyg-04-00273-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/01076f05a76f/fpsyg-04-00273-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/f8066226fefb/fpsyg-04-00273-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/2120283f68f2/fpsyg-04-00273-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/fc023a8576cc/fpsyg-04-00273-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4169/3669743/543821d23090/fpsyg-04-00273-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Choosing actions.选择行动。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 3;4:273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00273. eCollection 2013.
2
Computational mechanisms underlying latent value updating of unchosen actions.潜在未选动作价值更新的计算机制。
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 20;9(42):eadi2704. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2704.
3
Representation and Control of the Task Space in Humans and Humanoid Robots人类与类人机器人任务空间的表示与控制
4
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
5
Abstract inference of unchosen option values.未选择选项值的抽象推理。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Feb;51(3):909-921. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14577. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.并非所有选择都是平等的:与任务无关的选择相比,与任务相关的选择可以增强运动学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1879-1888. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1250-7.
7
Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.配对物体之间的隐含动作通过抑制作用导致可供性选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1021-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000059. Epub 2015 May 11.
8
Motor-cortical beta oscillations are modulated by correctness of observed action.运动皮层β振荡受观察到的动作正确性的调节。
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):767-775. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.018. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
9
Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection.神经心理学证据区分了物体选择和动作(效应器)选择。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Sep 1;17(6):547-62. doi: 10.1080/02643290050110647.
10
Action selection in multi-effector decision making.多效应器决策中的动作选择。
Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 15;70:66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reaching the cognitive-motor interface: effects of cognitive load on arm choice and motor performance after stroke.达到认知-运动界面:认知负荷对脑卒中后手臂选择和运动表现的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Dec;242(12):2785-2797. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06939-z. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
What matters in making demand-based decisions: Time alone or difficulty too?基于需求的决策中重要的是什么:仅仅是时间还是难度?
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1355-1365. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01583-6. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Planning actions with a magnetic tool: how initial tool orientation and number of functional ends influence motor planning abilities in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal control in the critical phase of movement: a functional approach to motor planning processes.运动关键阶段的最优控制:一种针对运动规划过程的功能方法。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jul;143(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
Motor interactions with another person: do individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder plan ahead?与他人的动作互动:自闭症谱系障碍个体是否会提前计划?
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;7:23. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00023. eCollection 2013.
3
End-state comfort and joint configuration variance during reaching.
使用磁性工具规划动作:初始工具方向和功能末端数量如何影响卷尾猴(僧面猴属)的运动规划能力
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):329-345. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01554-9. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Towards a common code for difficulty: Navigating a narrow gap is like memorizing an extra digit.朝向困难的通用编码:导航一个狭窄的间隙就像记住一个额外的数字。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Nov;83(8):3275-3284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02356-4. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Is Human Walking a Network Medicine Problem? An Analysis Using Symbolic Regression Models with Genetic Programming.人类行走是否属于网络医学问题?基于遗传编程的符号回归模型分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Jul;206:106104. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106104. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
6
The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.物体大小对翻转杯子任务中二阶规划的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01509-2. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
7
Visual search under physical effort is faster but more vulnerable to distractor interference.在体力劳动下进行视觉搜索会更快,但更容易受到干扰。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 12;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00283-4.
8
Collaboration Variability in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的协作变异性
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 6;14:559793. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.559793. eCollection 2020.
9
Differential effects of internal versus external focus of instruction on action planning and performance in patients with right and left hemispheric stroke.内部与外部教学关注点对左右半球中风患者动作规划及表现的不同影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Aug;72:102654. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102654. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance.避免努力不仅仅是避免错误。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1462-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01331-2. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
到达过程中的终末舒适感和关节构象变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(3):431-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3383-2. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
4
The tiger on your tail: choosing between temporally extended behaviors.紧随其后的老虎:在时间延长的行为之间做出选择。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):855-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440459. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Making decisions through a distributed consensus.通过分布式共识做出决策。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):927-36. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
6
Imagined actions aren't just weak actions: task variability promotes skill learning in physical practice but not in mental practice.想象中的动作不仅仅是微弱的动作:任务可变性促进物理实践中的技能学习,但不能促进心理实践中的技能学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1759-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028065. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.认知、动作和物体操控。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):924-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027839. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
8
Comparative investigations of manual action representations: evidence that chimpanzees represent the costs of potential future actions involving tools.手动动作表示的比较研究:证据表明黑猩猩能够表示涉及工具的潜在未来动作的成本。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jan 12;367(1585):48-58. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0189.
9
Evidence for motor planning in monkeys: rhesus macaques select efficient grips when transporting spoons.猴子存在运动规划的证据:恒河猴在运送勺子时会选择有效的抓握方式。
Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):822-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01030.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
10
Behavioral ecology meets motor behavior: choosing between walking and reaching paths.行为生态学与运动行为相遇:在行走路径和伸手够取路径之间做出选择。
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):131-6. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2010.548423.