Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分可预测重度创伤性脑损伤患者的1年预后。

Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, Majdan M, Janciak I, Wilbacher I, Rusnak M

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0269-3. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the association between the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data.

PATIENTS

Between 01/2001 and 12/2005, 13 European centres enrolled 1,172 patients with severe TBI. Data on accident, treatment and outcomes were collected. According to the GCS score at ICU discharge, survivors were classified into four groups: GCS scores 3-6, 7-9, 10-12 and 13-15. Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), 1-year outcomes were classified as "favourable" (scores 5, 4) or "unfavourable" (scores <4). Factors that may have contributed to outcomes were compared between groups and for favourable versus unfavourable outcomes within each group.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 538 patients analysed, 308 (57 %) had GCS scores 13-15, 101 (19 %) had scores 10-12, 46 (9 %) had scores 7-9 and 83 (15 %) had scores 3-6 at ICU discharge. Factors significantly associated with these GCS scores included age, severity of trauma, neurological status (GCS, pupils) at admission and patency of the basal cisterns on the first computed tomography (CT) scan. Favourable outcome was achieved in 74 % of all patients; the rates were significantly different between GCS groups (93, 83, 37 and 10 %, respectively). Within each of the GCS groups, significant differences regarding age and trauma severity were found between patients with favourable versus unfavourable outcomes; neurological status at admission and CT findings were not relevant.

CONCLUSION

The GCS score at ICU discharge is a good predictor of 1-year outcome. Patients with a GCS score <10 at ICU discharge have a poor chance of favourable outcome.

摘要

目的

分析重症监护病房(ICU)出院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分与重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者1年预后之间的关联。

设计

对前瞻性收集的观察数据进行回顾性分析。

患者

在2001年1月至2005年12月期间,13个欧洲中心纳入了1172例重度TBI患者。收集了有关事故、治疗和预后的数据。根据ICU出院时的GCS评分,将幸存者分为四组:GCS评分3 - 6分、7 - 9分、10 - 12分和13 - 15分。使用格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS),将1年预后分为“良好”(评分5分、4分)或“不良”(评分<4分)。比较了各组之间以及每组内良好与不良预后之间可能导致预后的因素。

主要结果

在分析的538例患者中,308例(57%)在ICU出院时GCS评分为13 - 15分,101例(19%)评分为10 - 12分,46例(9%)评分为7 - 9分,83例(15%)评分为3 - 6分。与这些GCS评分显著相关的因素包括年龄、创伤严重程度、入院时的神经状态(GCS、瞳孔)以及首次计算机断层扫描(CT)上基底池的通畅情况。所有患者中有74%获得了良好预后;GCS组之间的比例有显著差异(分别为93%、83%、37%和10%)。在每个GCS组内,良好与不良预后患者之间在年龄和创伤严重程度方面存在显著差异;入院时的神经状态和CT检查结果无关。

结论

ICU出院时的GCS评分是1年预后的良好预测指标。ICU出院时GCS评分<10分的患者获得良好预后的机会很小。

相似文献

1
Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0269-3. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
3
One-year outcome and course of recovery after severe traumatic brain injury.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Aug;37(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0053-6. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
6
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

4
Association between signs of life and survival in traumatic cardiac arrest patients: A nationwide, retrospective cohort study.
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 28;19:100701. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100701. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Predictive Factors of Return Home and Return to Work for Intensive Care Unit Survivors after Traumatic Brain Injury with a Follow-up Period of 2 Years.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Oct 15;62(10):465-474. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0149. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Patterns, Types, and Outcomes of Head Injury in Aseer Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Neurosci J. 2019 Mar 7;2019:2782146. doi: 10.1155/2019/2782146. eCollection 2019.
10
Long Term Outcome in Survivors of Decompressive Craniectomy following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan-Mar;14(1):52-57. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_147_17.

本文引用的文献

1
5
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria VI: effects of guideline-based management.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0765-0.
6
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria V: CT findings and surgical management.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0764-1.
7
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria IV: intensive care management.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):46-55. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0763-2.
8
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria III: prehospital status and treatment.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0762-3.
9
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria II: epidemiology of hospital admissions.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):29-34. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0761-4.
10
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria I: introduction to the study.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007 Feb;119(1-2):23-8. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0760-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验