ROP Screening, Treatment and Training Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Maternity and Women's Health Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Eye (Lond). 2013 Sep;27(9):1053-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.128. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
To compare the diagnostic efficacy of wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening.
Premature infants admitted for ROP screening were included in this prospective, randomized and double-blind comparative study. They were examined by using BIO and WFDRI.
A total of 58 infants were enrolled in the study. The sensitivities of WFDRI in detecting any stage of ROP, treatment-requiring ROP and plus disease were 58.6, 100, and 100% respectively, with a specificity of 100% for all. The proportional agreement between WFDRI and BIO was 0.903 for detection of any stage of ROP, 1.0 for treatment-requiring ROP, and 1.0 for plus disease.
The sensitivity and specificity of WFDRI was excellent for the diagnosis of severe and treatment-requiring ROP. However, BIO was superior in mild ROP particularly for the ones in retinal periphery.
比较广角数字视网膜成像(WFDRI)与双目间接检眼镜(BIO)在早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)筛查中的诊断效能。
本前瞻性、随机、双盲对比研究纳入了接受 ROP 筛查的早产儿。他们接受了 BIO 和 WFDRI 检查。
共有 58 例婴儿入组本研究。WFDRI 检测任何阶段 ROP、需治疗 ROP 和 plus 病的敏感度分别为 58.6%、100%和 100%,特异性均为 100%。WFDRI 与 BIO 检测任何阶段 ROP 的比例一致性为 0.903,检测需治疗 ROP 和 plus 病的比例一致性为 1.0。
WFDRI 对严重和需治疗 ROP 的诊断具有极好的敏感性和特异性。然而,BIO 在轻度 ROP 特别是视网膜周边病变的诊断方面更具优势。