Suppr超能文献

治疗宫颈癌的旅行距离:谁走得最远,这会影响结果吗?

Distance traveled for treatment of cervical cancer: who travels the farthest, and does it impact outcome?

机构信息

Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jul;23(6):1099-103. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182989464.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of distance from residence to treatment center on disease characteristics and recurrence of cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution retrospective chart review of patients treated for cervical cancer during 2006-2011 was performed. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Distance traveled from home to treatment facility was calculated and categorized. Recurrence and follow-up data were extracted; progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated. SAS version 9.2 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen patients met the study criteria; 75% were Caucasian. Forty-nine percent used tobacco. Twenty-five percent had stage III/IV disease. Insurance type was 46% private, 25% Medicaid, 20% Medicare, and 9% uninsured. Distance between residence and hospital was less than 15 miles (29%), 15 to 30 miles (21%), 30 to 50 miles (17%), and more than 50 miles (33%). Median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 1-65). Caucasians were more likely to travel more than 30 miles to a treatment center (P = 0.018) Non-Caucasians were less likely to have private insurance (P = 0.0005) and more likely to recur (P = 0.0045). Recurrence was highest (50%) in African Americans. Travel of more than 30 miles was not associated with age, stage, histology, tobacco abuse, employment, clinical trial enrollment, primary chemoradiation for stage IB disease, or delayed radiation. Travel of more than 30 miles was associated with government insurance (P = 0.029) and a trend toward unemployment (P = 0.059). Four-year progression-free survival (53% vs 52%; P = 0.992) and overall survival (57% vs 62%; P = 0.73) were similar between less than or more than 30-mile travel.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty percent of the patients reside more than 30 miles from treating hospital. Despite farther travel, stage of disease, clinical trial enrollment, treatment type, radiation completion, and recurrence rates were similar among patients with cervical cancer. Non-Caucasians are less likely to travel more than 30 miles.

摘要

目的

评估居住地到治疗中心的距离对宫颈癌疾病特征和复发的影响。

材料与方法

对 2006 年至 2011 年期间接受宫颈癌治疗的患者进行了单机构回顾性图表审查。记录了人口统计学、社会经济学和临床病理特征。计算并分类了从家到治疗机构的旅行距离。提取了复发和随访数据;计算了无进展生存率和总生存率。使用 SAS 版本 9.2 进行统计分析。

结果

符合研究标准的患者有 219 名;75%为白种人。49%的人吸烟。25%的人患有 III/IV 期疾病。保险类型分别为 46%私人保险、25%医疗补助、20%医疗保险和 9%无保险。居住地与医院的距离小于 15 英里(29%)、15 至 30 英里(21%)、30 至 50 英里(17%)和超过 50 英里(33%)。中位随访时间为 23 个月(范围 1-65)。白种人更有可能前往距离治疗中心超过 30 英里的地方(P=0.018)。非白种人更不可能拥有私人保险(P=0.0005),更有可能复发(P=0.0045)。非洲裔美国人的复发率最高(50%)。旅行距离超过 30 英里与年龄、分期、组织学、烟草滥用、就业、临床试验入组、IB 期疾病的原发放化疗或延迟放疗无关。旅行距离超过 30 英里与政府保险相关(P=0.029),且与失业趋势相关(P=0.059)。4 年无进展生存率(53%比 52%;P=0.992)和总生存率(57%比 62%;P=0.73)在旅行距离小于或大于 30 英里的患者之间相似。

结论

一半的患者居住在距离治疗医院 30 英里以上的地方。尽管旅行距离较远,但宫颈癌患者的疾病分期、临床试验入组、治疗类型、放疗完成情况和复发率相似。非白种人更不可能旅行超过 30 英里。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验