• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日本实际临床环境中比较米氮平和度洛西汀的临床特征:一项为期 4 周的开放性、平行分组研究治疗重度抑郁症。

Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan ; Department of Psychiatry, The Jindai Hospital, Toyota, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:781-6. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S43600. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S43600
PMID:23766648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3678901/
Abstract

No studies have compared mirtazapine with duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Fifty-six patients were nonrandomly assigned to a 4-week treatment with either 15 to 45 mg/day of mirtazapine (n = 22) or 20 to 60 mg/day of duloxetine (n = 34). The primary efficacy measurements were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression 6-point Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The second efficacy measurements were the response and remission rates of treatment. Tolerability assessments were also performed. Fifty-six patients (43 male; age, 43.6 years) were recruited. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation rate between the mirtazapine and duloxetine treatment groups (P = 0.867). Both mirtazapine and duloxetine significantly improved the HRSD and MADRS scores from baseline (P < 0.0001-0.0004). While mirtazapine was superior to duloxetine in the reduction of HRSD scores (P = 0.0421), there was no significant change in MADRS scores in terms of between-group differences (P = 0.171). While more somnolence was observed with mirtazapine (P = 0.0399), more nausea was associated with duloxetine (P = 0.0089). No serious adverse events were observed for either antidepressant. Mirtazapine and duloxetine were safe and well-tolerated treatments for Japanese patients with MDD. Double-blind controlled studies are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and duloxetine in Japanese patients with MDD.

摘要

尚无研究比较米氮平与度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效。56 例患者非随机分配接受为期 4 周的治疗,分别接受米氮平 15-45mg/天(n=22)或度洛西汀 20-60mg/天(n=34)。主要疗效测量指标为汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表 6 项评分(MADRS)。次要疗效测量指标为治疗的应答率和缓解率。还进行了耐受性评估。共招募 56 例患者(43 例男性;年龄 43.6 岁)。米氮平组和度洛西汀组的停药率无显著差异(P=0.867)。米氮平和度洛西汀均显著改善了 HRSD 和 MADRS 评分(P<0.0001-0.0004)。米氮平在降低 HRSD 评分方面优于度洛西汀(P=0.0421),但两组间差异的 MADRS 评分无显著变化(P=0.171)。米氮平组观察到更多的嗜睡(P=0.0399),而度洛西汀组则观察到更多的恶心(P=0.0089)。两种抗抑郁药均未观察到严重不良事件。米氮平和度洛西汀是治疗日本 MDD 患者安全且耐受良好的药物。需要进行双盲对照研究以进一步探讨米氮平和度洛西汀在日本 MDD 患者中的疗效和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/233f41ab8858/ndt-9-781Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/efc0036e7d63/ndt-9-781Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/e47c61d86ca2/ndt-9-781Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/233f41ab8858/ndt-9-781Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/efc0036e7d63/ndt-9-781Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/e47c61d86ca2/ndt-9-781Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ace0/3678901/233f41ab8858/ndt-9-781Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative clinical profile of mirtazapine and duloxetine in practical clinical settings in Japan: a 4-week open-label, parallel-group study of major depressive disorder.在日本实际临床环境中比较米氮平和度洛西汀的临床特征:一项为期 4 周的开放性、平行分组研究治疗重度抑郁症。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:781-6. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S43600. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
2
Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症:一项为期8周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验及三项研究的事后汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31 Pt 1:1405-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006.
3
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group.米氮平与西酞普兰的疗效及耐受性:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的双盲、随机研究。北欧抗抑郁药研究小组
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;14(6):329-37. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199911000-00002.
5
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms.一项度洛西汀治疗伴有疼痛性躯体症状的重性抑郁障碍患者的随机安慰剂对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609539. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.每日服用 60 毫克和 120 毫克度洛西汀治疗因重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1086-94. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
7
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in the treatment of pain in patients with major depressive disorder and at least moderate pain of unknown etiology: a randomized controlled trial.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症伴至少中度不明原因疼痛患者疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1110.
8
Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.艾司西酞普兰与度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症急性期的双盲对照研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00005.
9
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in major depressive disorder: a review with expert commentary.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:专家评论综述
Drugs Context. 2013 Jan 3;2013:212245. doi: 10.7573/dic.212245.
10
Duloxetine, 60 mg once daily, for major depressive disorder: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.度洛西汀,每日一次,每次60毫克,用于治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;63(4):308-15. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0407.

引用本文的文献

1
The molecular pathophysiology of depression and the new therapeutics.抑郁症的分子病理生理学与新疗法
MedComm (2020). 2022 Jul 21;3(3):e156. doi: 10.1002/mco2.156. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Astroglial Serotonin Receptors as the Central Target of Classic Antidepressants.星形胶质细胞 5-羟色胺受体作为经典抗抑郁药的中枢靶点。
Adv Neurobiol. 2021;26:317-347. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-77375-5_13.
3
The Role of Norepinephrine and Its α-Adrenergic Receptors in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.米氮平与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006528.pub2.
2
The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.度洛西汀治疗重性抑郁障碍的总体疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1159-73. doi: 10.2165/11318930-000000000-00000.
3
Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.
去甲肾上腺素及其α-肾上腺素能受体在重度抑郁症和精神分裂症病理生理学及治疗中的作用:一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 17;8:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00042. eCollection 2017.
4
Identifying predictive clinical characteristics of the treatment efficacy of mirtazapine monotherapy for major depressive disorder.确定米氮平单药治疗重度抑郁症疗效的预测性临床特征。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Oct 5;12:2533-2538. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S112901. eCollection 2016.
米氮平:对其在重度抑郁症及其他精神障碍中的应用综述
CNS Drugs. 2009;23(5):427-52. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923050-00006.
4
CLOCK may predict the response to fluvoxamine treatment in Japanese major depressive disorder patients.生物钟基因(CLOCK)可能预测日本重度抑郁症患者对氟伏沙明治疗的反应。
Neuromolecular Med. 2009;11(2):53-7. doi: 10.1007/s12017-009-8060-7. Epub 2009 Apr 4.
5
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.12种新一代抗抑郁药的疗效与可接受性比较:一项多治疗组元分析
Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):746-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60046-5.
6
Treatment benefits of duloxetine in major depressive disorder as assessed by number needed to treat.通过治疗所需人数评估度洛西汀在重度抑郁症中的治疗益处。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Sep;21(5):267-73. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200609000-00004.
7
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
8
Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.使用文拉法辛或选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗期间的缓解率。
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;178:234-41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.178.3.234.
9
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.一种旨在对变化敏感的新型抑郁量表。
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.