Kim Yong-Hyun, Kim Ki-Hyun
Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Department of Environment & Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 143-747, Republic of Korea.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 May 12;2013:241585. doi: 10.1155/2013/241585. Print 2013.
A statistical approach was investigated to estimate the concentration of compounds lacking authentic standards/surrogates (CLASS). As a means to assess the reliability of this approach, the response factor (RF) of CLASS is derived by predictive equations based on a linear regression (LR) analysis between the actual RF (by external calibration) of 18 reference volatile organic compounds (VOCs) consisting of six original functional groups and their physicochemical parameters ((1) carbon number (CN), (2) molecular weight (MW), and (3) boiling point (BP)). If the experimental bias is estimated in terms of percent difference (PD) between the actual and projected RF, the least bias for 18 VOCs is found from CN (17.9 ± 19.0%). In contrast, the PD values against MW and BP are 40.6% and 81.5%, respectively. Predictive equations were hence derived via an LR analysis between the actual RF and CN for 29 groups: (1) one group consisting of all 18 reference VOCs, (2) three out of six original functional groups, and (3) 25 groups formed randomly from the six functional groups. The applicability of this method was tested by fitting these 29 equations into each of the six original functional groups. According to this approach, the mean PD for 18 compounds dropped as low as 5.60 ± 5.63%. This approach can thus be used as a practical tool to assess the quantitative data for CLASS.
研究了一种统计方法来估计缺乏真实标准品/替代物的化合物(CLASS)的浓度。作为评估该方法可靠性的一种手段,CLASS的响应因子(RF)通过基于18种参考挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的实际RF(通过外标法)与它们的物理化学参数((1) 碳原子数(CN)、(2) 分子量(MW)和(3) 沸点(BP))之间的线性回归(LR)分析的预测方程得出。这18种VOC由六个原始官能团组成。如果根据实际RF与预测RF之间的百分比差异(PD)来估计实验偏差,则发现18种VOC中来自CN的偏差最小(17.9 ± 19.0%)。相比之下,相对于MW和BP的PD值分别为40.6%和81.5%。因此,通过对29组数据进行LR分析得出预测方程,这29组数据为:(1) 一组由全部18种参考VOC组成,(2) 六个原始官能团中的三个,(3) 从六个官能团中随机形成的25组。通过将这29个方程应用于六个原始官能团中的每一个来测试该方法的适用性。根据这种方法,18种化合物的平均PD降至5.60 ± 5.63%。因此,这种方法可以用作评估CLASS定量数据的实用工具。