Raj Anita, Dasgupta Anindita, Goldson Irvienne, Lafontant Dumas, Freeman Elmer, Silverman Jay G
a Department of Medicine, Division of Global Public Health , University of California , San Diego , CA , USA.
AIDS Care. 2014 Feb;26(2):152-9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2013.804901. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
Few community-based HIV interventions exist for Black men at heterosexual risk for HIV. None focus on structural HIV risks such as unemployment and unstable housing. This study involved a pilot evaluation of the MEN (Making Employment Needs) Count HIV intervention, a three session peer counselor-delivered program of HIV risk reduction and gender-equity counseling, and employment and housing case management. A single-arm intervention trial of MEN Count was conducted with Black men recruited from a community men's clinic and social services program. Eligible men were those who reported two or more sex partners in the past six months and current unemployment and/or recent homelessness. Most participants (68%) had a history of incarceration. Participants (N = 50) were surveyed on outcomes at baseline (Time 1), posttest (Time 2; 60-90 days after baseline), and two-month follow-up (Time 3). The majority of participants were retained in the program (86%) and the final follow-up survey (76%). McNemar tests revealed significant reductions in the past 30-day unprotected sex from Time 1 (74%) to Time 2 (47%) and to Time 3 (47%), and in homelessness from Time 1 (58%) to Time 3 (32%). Significant increases in employment from Time 1 (8%) to Time 2 (29%) and Time 3 (32%) were also seen. Participants completed a brief participant satisfaction survey at posttest. Most (n=28, 65%) rated the program as excellent, and an additional 10 (23%) rated it as good. Although there was no significant reduction in multiple sex partners, a trend was observed from Time 1 (56%) to Time 2 (44%) and Time 3 (42%). Findings suggest that the MEN Count model is a feasible and promising HIV prevention program for Black men at heterosexual risk for HIV. Larger scale implementation and more rigorous evaluation of MEN Count are needed to confirm the study findings.
针对有感染艾滋病毒异性传播风险的黑人男性,几乎没有基于社区的艾滋病毒干预措施。没有一项措施关注诸如失业和住房不稳定等结构性艾滋病毒风险。本研究涉及对“男性(关注就业需求)计数艾滋病毒干预措施”进行试点评估,这是一个由同伴咨询师提供的为期三节课的项目,包括艾滋病毒风险降低和性别平等咨询,以及就业和住房个案管理。对从社区男性诊所和社会服务项目招募的黑人男性进行了一项单组干预试验。符合条件的男性是那些报告在过去六个月中有两个或更多性伴侣且目前失业和/或近期无家可归的人。大多数参与者(68%)有监禁史。对参与者(N = 50)在基线(时间1)、测试后(时间2;基线后60 - 90天)和两个月随访(时间3)时的结果进行了调查。大多数参与者(86%)留在了该项目中,最终随访调查时的留存率为76%。McNemar检验显示,过去30天无保护性行为从时间1(74%)到时间2(47%)再到时间3(47%)有显著减少,无家可归情况从时间1(58%)到时间3(32%)有显著减少。就业情况从时间1(8%)到时间2(29%)再到时间3(32%)也有显著增加。参与者在测试后完成了一份简短的参与者满意度调查。大多数(n = 28,65%)将该项目评为优秀,另有10人(23%)评为良好。虽然多性伴情况没有显著减少,但从时间1(56%)到时间2(44%)再到时间3(42%)观察到了一种趋势。研究结果表明,“男性计数”模式对于有感染艾滋病毒异性传播风险的黑人男性是一个可行且有前景的艾滋病毒预防项目。需要对“男性计数”进行更大规模的实施和更严格的评估以证实研究结果。