• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用视觉模拟评分法对结石排出、支架和支架取出相关疼痛进行前瞻性评估。

A prospective evaluation of pain associated with stone passage, stents, and stent removal using a visual analog scale.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.031. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.031
PMID:23768523
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perception of colicky pain due to ureteral stones and double-J (DJ)-associated discomfort and to evaluate the role of clinical parameters that might influence the perception of pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2011 to May 2012, 124 consecutive patients with colicky pain due to ureteral stones and ureteroscopic stone extraction underwent DJ stent placement. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain at ureteral colic, during indwelling DJ stent, and at DJ stent removal. The association of clinical data with pain scores was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Pain perception at the time of colic did not vary according to sex (P = .804), age (P = .674), or DJ stent length (P = .389). Stone size (<4 mm) was a predictor of a high VAS score (P = .001). Patients with recurrent stone formation had significantly less pain at the time of colic (P = .004), and DJ stent removal (P = .004) than those with the first instance of stone formation. The clinical experience at cystoscopic DJ stent removal influenced pain perception (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Using a VAS for the evaluation of pain perception is a valid method for the objectification of subjective discomfort. The VAS is an easy to administer scale and provides accurate information on the patients' status. Additional studies with larger cohorts focusing on pain perception using the VAS and other validated questionnaires are recommended to produce more consistent data.

摘要

目的

研究输尿管结石绞痛和双 J(DJ)相关不适的感知,并评估可能影响疼痛感知的临床参数的作用。

材料和方法

2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 5 月,124 例因输尿管结石和输尿管镜取石术而出现绞痛的连续患者接受了 DJ 支架置入术。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估输尿管绞痛时、DJ 支架留置时和 DJ 支架取出时的疼痛。还分析了临床数据与疼痛评分的相关性。

结果

绞痛时的疼痛感知与性别(P =.804)、年龄(P =.674)或 DJ 支架长度(P =.389)无关。结石大小(<4mm)是 VAS 评分高的预测因素(P =.001)。复发性结石形成的患者在绞痛时(P =.004)和 DJ 支架取出时(P =.004)疼痛明显减轻。膀胱镜 DJ 支架取出时的临床经验影响疼痛感知(P <.001)。

结论

使用 VAS 评估疼痛感知是对主观不适进行客观评估的有效方法。VAS 是一种易于管理的量表,可提供患者状况的准确信息。建议进行更多使用 VAS 和其他经过验证的问卷评估疼痛感知的研究,以产生更一致的数据。

相似文献

1
A prospective evaluation of pain associated with stone passage, stents, and stent removal using a visual analog scale.采用视觉模拟评分法对结石排出、支架和支架取出相关疼痛进行前瞻性评估。
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.031. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
2
[Prospective evaluation of pain associated with indwelling JJ stents following ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy].[输尿管镜碎石术后留置双J管相关疼痛的前瞻性评估]
Przegl Lek. 2013;70(11):936-8.
3
Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出的再思考:患者的感受及偏好是什么?一项随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2015 Dec 9;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6.
4
Magnetic Ureteral Stent Removal Without Cystoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.无需膀胱镜检查的磁性输尿管支架取出术:一项随机对照试验。
J Endourol. 2017 Aug;31(8):762-766. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0051. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Re: Kuehhas et al.: A prospective evaluation of pain associated with stone passage, stents, and stent removal using a visual analog scale (Urology 2013;82: 521-525).
Urology. 2013 Nov;82(5):1192. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.032.
6
Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: a cost-benefit analysis.在无并发症的输尿管镜检查后使用取出线取出输尿管支架:成本效益分析。
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):329-332. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4469.
7
Office-based ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia for obstructing stones is safe and efficacious.在局部麻醉下进行基于办公室的输尿管支架置入术治疗梗阻性结石是安全有效的。
Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.021. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
8
Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石后的支架定位:问题仍未解决。
Eur Urol. 2004 Sep;46(3):381-7; discussion 387-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.004.
9
Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.评价使用磁性末端输尿管双 J 支架进行短期输尿管支架置入术相关的疼痛感知。
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):475-479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2146-x. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Short-term external ureter stenting shows significant benefit in comparison to routine double-J stent placement after ureterorenoscopic stone extraction: A prospective randomized trial - the Fast track stent study (FaST).与输尿管镜取石术后常规双J支架置入相比,短期外置输尿管支架置入显示出显著优势:一项前瞻性随机试验——快速通道支架研究(FaST)。
Int J Urol. 2018 Aug;25(8):717-722. doi: 10.1111/iju.13711. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Effects of delayed ureteral stents removal during the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life and psychological status of postoperative patients with urinary calculi].[新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间延迟拔除输尿管支架对尿路结石术后患者生活质量及心理状态的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Oct 18;55(5):857-864. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.013.
2
The Use of Visual Analogue Scale Score as a Predicting Tool in Differentiating Renal Colic From Lumbar Back Pain.视觉模拟评分量表得分作为区分肾绞痛与腰背痛的预测工具的应用
Cureus. 2021 Jul 13;13(7):e16377. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16377. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
The Efficacy and Safety of Ureteric Stent Removal with Strings versus No Strings: Which Is Better?
导丝与无导丝在输尿管支架取出中的疗效和安全性:哪种更好?
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 15;2020:4081409. doi: 10.1155/2020/4081409. eCollection 2020.
4
A ureteral stent crossing the bladder midline leads to worse urinary symptoms.一根穿过膀胱中线的输尿管支架会导致更严重的泌尿系统症状。
Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(4):412-417. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1533. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Evaluation of pain perception associated with use of the magnetic-end ureteric double-J stent for short-term ureteric stenting.评价使用磁性末端输尿管双 J 支架进行短期输尿管支架置入术相关的疼痛感知。
World J Urol. 2018 Mar;36(3):475-479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2146-x. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Impact of loop-tail ureteral stents on ureteral stent-related symptoms immediately after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Comparison with pigtail ureteral stents.输尿管镜碎石术后即刻留置 Loop 尾端型输尿管支架与留置猪尾巴型输尿管支架对输尿管支架相关症状的影响比较。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):440-446. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.440. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Ureteric stents on extraction strings: a systematic review of literature.输尿管支架取石装置:文献系统综述。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Apr;46(2):129-136. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0898-1. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
8
α-blockers for the reduction of ureteric stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.α受体阻滞剂用于减轻输尿管支架相关症状:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Feb;11(2):660-668. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2942. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出的再思考:患者的感受及偏好是什么?一项随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2015 Dec 9;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6.
10
Patient experiences and preferences with ureteral stent removal.患者对输尿管支架取出的体验和偏好。
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):35-40. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0402.