Suppr超能文献

两种咀嚼式昆虫食草动物在松树上诱导化学防御的能力具有针对性的植物组织、特定的食草动物和防御特性特异性。

Inducibility of chemical defences by two chewing insect herbivores in pine trees is specific to targeted plant tissue, particular herbivore and defensive trait.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 92697 Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Phytochemistry. 2013 Oct;94:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that plants can react to biotic aggressions with highly specific responses. However, few studies have attempted to jointly investigate whether the induction of plant defences is specific to a targeted plant tissue, plant species, herbivore identity, and defensive trait. Here we studied those factors contributing to the specificity of induced defensive responses in two economically important pine species against two chewing insect pest herbivores. Juvenile trees of Pinus pinaster and P. radiata were exposed to herbivory by two major pest threats, the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (a bark-feeder) and the pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa (a folivore). We quantified in two tissues (stem and needles) the constitutive (control plants) and herbivore-induced concentrations of total polyphenolics, volatile and non-volatile resin, as well as the profile of mono- and sesquiterpenes. Stem chewing by the pine weevil increased concentrations of non-volatile resin, volatile monoterpenes, and (marginally) polyphenolics in stem tissues. Weevil feeding also increased the concentration of non-volatile resin and decreased polyphenolics in the needle tissues. Folivory by the caterpillar had no major effects on needle defensive chemistry, but a strong increase in the concentration of polyphenolics in the stem. Interestingly, we found similar patterns for all these above-reported effects in both pine species. These results offer convincing evidence that induced defences are highly specific and may vary depending on the targeted plant tissue, the insect herbivore causing the damage and the considered defensive compound.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,植物可以对生物侵害做出高度特异性的反应。然而,很少有研究试图共同探讨植物防御的诱导是否特定于靶向植物组织、植物物种、食草动物身份和防御特性。在这里,我们研究了两个经济上重要的松树物种对两种咀嚼式昆虫害虫的防御反应诱导的特异性的因素。火炬松和辐射松的幼树受到两种主要害虫威胁的取食,即大型松象鼻虫(一种树皮取食者)和松毛虫(一种食叶者)。我们在两个组织(茎和针叶)中定量了总多酚、挥发性和非挥发性树脂以及单萜和倍半萜的组成(对照植物)和食草动物诱导的浓度。松象鼻虫对茎的咀嚼增加了茎组织中非挥发性树脂、挥发性单萜和(边缘)多酚的浓度。象鼻虫取食还增加了针叶中非挥发性树脂和多酚的浓度。毛虫的取食对针叶的防御化学物质没有重大影响,但对茎中的多酚浓度有强烈的增加。有趣的是,我们在这两个松树物种中都发现了所有上述报告的影响都具有相似的模式。这些结果提供了令人信服的证据,表明诱导的防御是高度特异性的,可能取决于靶向植物组织、造成损害的昆虫食草动物和考虑的防御化合物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验