Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Misión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
PLoS One. 2020 May 1;15(5):e0232692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232692. eCollection 2020.
Inducibility of defences in response to biotic stimuli is considered an important trait in plant resistance. In conifers, previous research has mostly focused on the inducibility of the volatile fraction of the oleoresin (mono- and sesquiterpenes), leaving the inducibility of the non-volatile resin acids largely unexplored, particularly in response to real herbivory. Here we investigated the differences in the inducibility of resin acids in two pine species, one native from Europe (Pinus pinaster Ait.) and another from North America (Pinus radiata D. Don), in response to wounding by two European insects: a bark chewer, the pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.), and a defoliator, the pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.). We quantified the constitutive (control) and induced concentrations of resin acids in the stem and needles of both pine species by gas chromatography techniques. Both pine species strongly increased the concentration of resin acids in the stem after pine weevil feeding, although the response was greater in P. pinaster than in P. radiata. However, systemic defensive responses in the needles were negligible in both pine species after pine weevil feeding in the stem. On the other hand, P. radiata locally reduced the resin acid concentration in the needles after pine caterpillar feeding, whereas in P. pinaster resin acid concentration was apparently unaffected. Nevertheless, systemic induction of resin acids was only observed in the stem of P. pinaster in response to pine caterpillar feeding. In summary, pine induced responses were found highly compartmentalized, and specific to herbivore identity. Particularly, plant defence suppression mechanisms by the pine caterpillar, and ontogenetic factors might be potentially affecting the induced response of resin acids in both pine species.
植物对生物胁迫产生防御反应的能力被认为是其抗性的一个重要特征。在针叶树中,先前的研究主要集中在松脂挥发部分(单萜和倍半萜)的诱导能力上,而对非挥发性树脂酸的诱导能力则知之甚少,特别是针对真正的食草动物。在这里,我们研究了两种松树(一种原产于欧洲的欧洲赤松(Pinus pinaster Ait.)和另一种原产于北美的辐射松(Pinus radiata D. Don))对两种欧洲昆虫(树皮咀嚼者欧洲松象鼻虫(Hylobius abietis L.)和食叶者欧洲松毛虫(Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.))造成的伤害的反应中树脂酸诱导能力的差异。我们通过气相色谱技术量化了两种松树的茎和针叶中组成型(对照)和诱导型树脂酸的浓度。两种松树在欧洲松象鼻虫取食后都强烈增加了茎中的树脂酸浓度,尽管赤松的反应大于辐射松。然而,在欧洲松象鼻虫取食茎后,两种松树的针叶中都没有明显的系统防御反应。另一方面,在辐射松中,欧洲松毛虫取食针叶后局部降低了针叶中的树脂酸浓度,而在赤松中,树脂酸浓度显然没有受到影响。然而,只有在辐射松对欧洲松毛虫取食茎时,才能观察到赤松茎中树脂酸的系统诱导。总之,发现松树的诱导反应具有高度的分隔性,并且对食草动物的身份具有特异性。特别是,松毛虫对植物防御的抑制机制和个体发育因素可能会潜在地影响两种松树中树脂酸的诱导反应。