• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自轴木树(Anogeissus leiocarpus)的酚酸对丝状线虫奥氏盘尾丝虫(Onchocerca ochengi)及自由生活线虫秀丽隐杆线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans)耐药菌株的驱虫活性。

Anthelmintic activity of phenolic acids from the axlewood tree Anogeissus leiocarpus on the filarial nematode Onchocerca ochengi and drug-resistant strains of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

作者信息

Ndjonka D, Abladam E D, Djafsia B, Ajonina-Ekoti I, Achukwi M D, Liebau E

机构信息

Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundere,PO Box 454,Ngaoundere,Cameroon.

Institute for Zoophysiology,Schlossplatz 8,48143Muenster,Germany.

出版信息

J Helminthol. 2014 Dec;88(4):481-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1300045X. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1017/S0022149X1300045X
PMID:23768773
Abstract

The effect of three phenols (ellagic, gentisic and gallic acids) from the axlewood tree Anogeissus leiocarpus on Onchocerca ochengi and drug-resistant strains of Caenorhabditis elegans, a model organism for research on nematode parasites, is investigated. Worms were incubated in different concentrations of phenols and their survival was monitored after 48 h. Among the three acids, ellagic acid strongly affected the survival of O. ochengi microfilariae, O. ochengi adults, a wild-type C. elegans and anthelmintic-resistant strains of C. elegans, namely albendazole (CB3474), levamisole (CB211, ZZ16) and ivermectin (VC722, DA1316), with LC50 values ranging from 0.03 mm to 0.96 mm. These results indicate that the binding of ellagic acid in the worm differs from that of resistant strains of C. elegans. The efficacy of both gallic and gentisic acids was not significantly changed in resistant strains of C. elegans treated with levamisole (ZZ16, LC50= 9.98 mm, with gallic acid), albendazole (CB3474, LC50= 7.81 mm, with gentisic acid) and ivermectin (DA1316, LC50= 10.62 mm, with gentisic acid). The efficacy of these three pure compounds is in accordance with the use of A. leiocarpus from its locality of origin. The in vivo toxicity data reveal that the thresholds are up to 200 times higher than the determined LC50 values. Thus, ellagic acid could be a potential option for the treatment of nematode infections, even in cases of drug resistance towards established anthelmintic drugs.

摘要

研究了来自轴木(Anogeissus leiocarpus)的三种酚类物质(鞣花酸、龙胆酸和没食子酸)对线虫寄生虫研究的模式生物——奥氏盘尾丝虫(Onchocerca ochengi)以及秀丽隐杆线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans)耐药菌株的影响。将蠕虫置于不同浓度的酚类物质中孵育,并在48小时后监测其存活率。在这三种酸中,鞣花酸强烈影响奥氏盘尾丝虫微丝蚴、奥氏盘尾丝虫成虫、野生型秀丽隐杆线虫以及秀丽隐杆线虫的抗驱虫药菌株,即阿苯达唑(CB3474)、左旋咪唑(CB211、ZZ16)和伊维菌素(VC722、DA1316)的存活,其半数致死浓度(LC50)值在0.03毫米至0.96毫米之间。这些结果表明,鞣花酸在蠕虫中的结合方式与秀丽隐杆线虫耐药菌株不同。在用左旋咪唑(ZZ16,LC50 = 9.98毫米,与没食子酸联用)、阿苯达唑(CB3474,LC50 = 7.81毫米,与龙胆酸联用)和伊维菌素(DA1316,LC50 = 10.62毫米,与龙胆酸联用)处理的秀丽隐杆线虫耐药菌株中,没食子酸和龙胆酸的效力没有显著变化。这三种纯化合物的效力与轴木在其原产地的使用情况相符。体内毒性数据显示,阈值比测定的LC50值高出200倍。因此,即使在对现有驱虫药产生耐药性的情况下,鞣花酸也可能是治疗线虫感染的潜在选择。

相似文献

1
Anthelmintic activity of phenolic acids from the axlewood tree Anogeissus leiocarpus on the filarial nematode Onchocerca ochengi and drug-resistant strains of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.来自轴木树(Anogeissus leiocarpus)的酚酸对丝状线虫奥氏盘尾丝虫(Onchocerca ochengi)及自由生活线虫秀丽隐杆线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans)耐药菌株的驱虫活性。
J Helminthol. 2014 Dec;88(4):481-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1300045X. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
2
Anogeissus leiocarpus extract on the parasite nematode Onchocerca ochengi and on drug resistant mutant strains of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.厚皮树提取物对寄生虫线虫奥氏曼森线虫和自由生活线虫秀丽隐杆线虫耐药突变株的作用。
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Nov 23;190(1-2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.027. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
3
Phytochemical analysis and in vitro anthelmintic activity of Lophira lanceolata (Ochnaceae) on the bovine parasite Onchocerca ochengi and on drug resistant strains of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.披针叶洛菲木(金莲木科)对牛寄生虫奥氏盘尾丝虫及自由生活线虫秀丽隐杆线虫耐药株的植物化学分析和体外驱虫活性
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1904-z.
4
In vitro activity of Cameroonian and Ghanaian medicinal plants on parasitic (Onchocerca ochengi) and free-living (Caenorhabditis elegans) nematodes.喀麦隆和加纳药用植物对寄生线虫(奥氏盘尾丝虫)和自由生活线虫(秀丽隐杆线虫)的体外活性。
J Helminthol. 2011 Sep;85(3):304-12. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000635. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
5
Anti-Onchocerca and Anti-Caenorhabditis Activity of a Hydro-Alcoholic Extract from the Fruits of Acacia nilotica and Some Proanthocyanidin Derivatives.抗盘尾丝虫和抗线虫活性的一个水醇提自 Acacia nilotica 的果实和一些原花青素衍生物。
Molecules. 2017 May 6;22(5):748. doi: 10.3390/molecules22050748.
6
Anthelmintic effect of Psidium guajava and Tagetes erecta on wild-type and Levamisole-resistant Caenorhabditis elegans strains.番石榴和万寿菊对野生型和左旋咪唑抗性秀丽隐杆线虫的驱虫效果。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Apr 18;202:92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Comparison of motility, recovery, and methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium reduction assays for use in screening plant products for anthelmintic activity.用于筛选具有驱虫活性植物产品的运动性、恢复性和甲基噻唑基四氮唑还原试验的比较
Parasitol Res. 2009 Oct;105(5):1339-43. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1560-4. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
8
Anthelmintic effect of plant extracts containing condensed and hydrolyzable tannins on Caenorhabditis elegans, and their antioxidant capacity.含缩合和可水解单宁植物提取物对秀丽隐杆线虫的驱虫效果及其抗氧化能力。
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Feb 18;192(1-3):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.030. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
9
Anthelmintic activity of KSI-4088 against Caenorhabditis elegans.KSI-4088 对秀丽隐杆线虫的驱虫活性。
Parasitol Res. 2010 Jun;107(1):27-30. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1828-8. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
10
Activity of novel nicotinic anthelmintics in cut preparations of Caenorhabditis elegans.新型烟碱类驱虫药在秀丽隐杆线虫切片中的活性。
Int J Parasitol. 2011 Mar;41(3-4):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Extract as a Potential Anticoccidial Agent: Evidence of Its MUC2 Regulatory Impact in Murine Jejunum.作为潜在抗球虫剂的提取物:其对小鼠空肠MUC2调节作用的证据
Vet Sci. 2024 Oct 10;11(10):490. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11100490.
2
Influence of fecal fermentation on the anthelmintic activity of proanthocyanidins and ellagitannins against human intestinal nematodes and .粪便发酵对原花青素和鞣花单宁对人体肠道线虫的驱虫活性的影响以及…… (原文结尾不完整)
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1390500. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1390500. eCollection 2024.
3
An ethnopharmacological approach to evaluate antiparasitic and health-promoting abilities of Pueraria tuberosa (Willd.) DC. in livestock.
一种评估野葛(Willd.)在牲畜中抗寄生虫和促进健康能力的民族药理学方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0305667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305667. eCollection 2024.
4
Filaricidal Properties of Aqueous Extracts of (Combretaceae) on (Onchocercidae).使君子科植物水提取物对盘尾丝虫科的杀丝虫特性
J Parasitol Res. 2024 Jan 31;2024:2119056. doi: 10.1155/2024/2119056. eCollection 2024.
5
Medicinal plants as a source of antiparasitics: an overview of experimental studies.药用植物作为抗寄生虫药物的来源:实验研究综述。
Pathog Glob Health. 2023 Sep;117(6):535-553. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2023.2179454. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
6
Anthelmintic Agents from African Medicinal Plants: Review and Prospects.来自非洲药用植物的驱虫剂:综述与展望
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Dec 31;2022:8023866. doi: 10.1155/2022/8023866. eCollection 2022.
7
Fractionation Coupled to Molecular Networking: Towards Identification of Anthelmintic Molecules in (DC.) Baill.分段与分子网络相结合:鉴定 (DC.)Baill. 中的驱虫分子
Molecules. 2022 Dec 22;28(1):76. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010076.
8
Review on Plant-Based Management in Combating Antimicrobial Resistance - Mechanistic Perspective.基于植物的抗菌耐药性管理综述——机制视角
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 29;13:879495. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.879495. eCollection 2022.
9
Anthelmintic Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Phytochemical Screening of Plants Used to Treat Digestive Parasitosis of Small Ruminants in Benin (West Africa).贝宁(西非)用于治疗小型反刍动物消化寄生虫病的植物的驱虫活性、细胞毒性及植物化学筛选
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 10;12(19):2718. doi: 10.3390/ani12192718.
10
Herbal anthelmintic agents: a narrative review.草药驱虫药:叙事性综述。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2022 Aug;42(4):641-651. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2022.04.007.