Scholl Alex, McCarty James, Scholl Desiree, Mar Alice
St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;52(5):580-3. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
The surgical correction of hammer digits offers a variety of surgical treatments ranging from arthroplasty to arthrodesis, with many options for fixation. In the present study, we compared 2 buried implants for arthrodesis of lesser digit deformities: a Smart Toe® implant and a buried Kirschner wire. Both implants were placed in a prepared interphalangeal joint, did not violate other digital or metatarsal joints, and were not exposed percutaneously. A retrospective comparative study was performed of 117 digits with either a Smart Toe® implant or a buried Kirschner wire, performed from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010. Of the 117 digits, 31 were excluded because of a lack of 90-day radiographic follow-up. The average follow-up was 94 to 1130 days. The average patient age was 61.47 (range 43 to 84) years. Of the 86 included digits, 48 were left digits and 38 were right. Of the digits corrected, 54 were second digits, 24 were third digits and 8 were fourth digits. Fifty-eight Smart Toe® implants were found (15 with 19-mm straight; 2 with 19-mm angulated; 34 with 16-mm straight; and 7 with 16-mm angulated). Twenty-eight buried Kirschner wires were evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found between the Smart Toe® implants and the buried Kirschner wires, including the rate of malunion, nonunion, fracture of internal fixation, and the need for revision surgery. Of the 86 implants, 87.9% of the Smart Toe® implants and 85.7% of the buried Kirschner wires were in good position (0° to 10° of transverse angulation on radiographs). Osseous union was achieved in 68.9% of Smart Toe® implants and 82.1% of buried Kirschner wires. Fracture of internal fixation occurred in 12 of the Smart Toe® implants (20.7%) and 2 of the buried Kirschner wires (7.1%). Most of the fractured internal fixation and malunions or nonunions were asymptomatic, leading to revision surgery in only 8.6% of the Smart Toe® implants and 10.7% of the buried Kirschner wires. Both the Smart Toe® implant and the buried Kirschner wire offer a viable choice for internal fixation of an arthrodesis of the digit compared with other studies using other techniques.
锤状趾的手术矫正提供了从关节成形术到关节融合术等多种手术治疗方法,且有多种固定选择。在本研究中,我们比较了用于矫正小趾畸形关节融合术的两种埋藏式植入物:Smart Toe®植入物和埋藏式克氏针。两种植入物均置于准备好的指间关节,未侵犯其他趾关节或跖关节,且未经皮外露。我们对2007年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间进行的117例采用Smart Toe®植入物或埋藏式克氏针治疗的趾进行了一项回顾性对照研究。在这117例趾中,31例因缺乏90天的影像学随访而被排除。平均随访时间为94至1130天。患者平均年龄为61.47岁(范围43至84岁)。在纳入的86例趾中,48例为左趾,38例为右趾。在矫正的趾中,54例为第二趾,24例为第三趾,8例为第四趾。共发现58枚Smart Toe®植入物(15枚19毫米直形;2枚19毫米成角形;34枚16毫米直形;7枚16毫米成角形)。评估了28根埋藏式克氏针。Smart Toe®植入物和埋藏式克氏针之间未发现统计学上的显著差异,包括畸形愈合率、不愈合率、内固定骨折率以及翻修手术的必要性。在86枚植入物中,87.9%的Smart Toe®植入物和85.7%的埋藏式克氏针位置良好(X线片上横向成角0°至10°)。68.9%的Smart Toe®植入物和82.1%的埋藏式克氏针实现了骨愈合。12枚Smart Toe®植入物(20.7%)和2根埋藏式克氏针(7.1%)发生了内固定骨折。大多数内固定骨折及畸形愈合或不愈合均无症状,仅8.6%的Smart Toe®植入物和10.7%的埋藏式克氏针因此需要进行翻修手术。与使用其他技术的其他研究相比,Smart Toe®植入物和埋藏式克氏针均为趾关节融合术的内固定提供了可行的选择。