Suppr超能文献

聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂与硬化剂注射治疗一级痔病的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、对照、单盲、多中心试验。

Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam in comparison with fluid sclerosant in the treatment of first-grade haemorrhoidal disease: a randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre trial.

机构信息

"Suedstadt" Surgical Group Practise, Karolingerring 31, 50678, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Oct;28(10):1439-47. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1729-2. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice for first-grade haemorrhoidal disease. Numerous studies have shown that sclerotherapy with foamed sclerosants is more efficacious than liquid in the treatment of varicose veins. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of polidocanol foam in comparison with liquid for haemorrhoidal disease.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients were randomised to foam or liquid sclerotherapy (polidocanol 3%). Patients with first-grade haemorrhoidal disease were included and blinded to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the stopping of perianal bleeding after one sclerotherapy session. Sclerotherapy was repeated until patients were free of bleeding (2-week intervals). The final follow-up was 12 weeks after the last sclerotherapy session.

RESULTS

In the foam group, significantly more patients (88%) were treated successfully after one sclerotherapy session compared to the liquid group (69%; p = 0.01). There was high patient satisfaction in both groups, but significantly more patients were satisfied with their treatment in the foam group than in the liquid group (99 vs. 84%; p = 0.009). Additionally, in the foam group, significantly less treatment sessions were required (p < 0.001), and the total amount of injected polidocanol was reduced (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the therapy of first-grade haemorrhoidal disease, polidocanol 3 % foam is more effective and equally safe compared to liquid polidocanol. The results of this trial show that foam sclerotherapy is a new, innovative, effective and safe non-surgical treatment option for haemorrhoidal disease.

摘要

目的

硬化疗法是一级痔病的首选治疗方法。大量研究表明,与液体硬化剂相比,泡沫硬化剂硬化疗法治疗静脉曲张更有效。本研究旨在评估聚多卡醇泡沫与液体硬化剂治疗痔病的疗效和安全性。

方法

共有 130 名患者被随机分为泡沫或液体硬化疗法(聚多卡醇 3%)。纳入一级痔病患者,并对治疗分组进行盲法处理。主要终点是单次硬化疗法治疗后肛门周围出血停止。每 2 周重复硬化疗法,直到患者不再出血(间隔 2 周)。末次硬化疗法后 12 周进行最终随访。

结果

在泡沫组中,接受一次硬化疗法治疗后,有更多的患者(88%)治疗成功,而液体组为 69%(p=0.01)。两组患者的满意度均较高,但泡沫组中对治疗更满意的患者明显多于液体组(99%比 84%;p=0.009)。此外,在泡沫组中,需要的治疗次数明显更少(p<0.001),并且注射的聚多卡醇总量减少(p<0.001)。

结论

在一级痔病的治疗中,与液体聚多卡醇相比,3%聚多卡醇泡沫更有效且安全性相当。本试验结果表明,泡沫硬化疗法是一种新的、创新的、有效且安全的非手术治疗痔病的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验