Gallo Gaetano, Grossi Ugo, De Simone Veronica, Picciariello Arcangelo, Diaco Elia, Fan Pin, He Hongbo, Li Jun, Lin Hongcheng, La Torre Marco, Laforgia Rita, Lobascio Pierluigi, Ma Hui, Pata Francesco, Perinotti Roberto, Parades Vincent, Pozzo Mauro, Realis Luc Alberto, Salgueiro Paulo, Skowronski Adam, Sun Pingliang, Trompetto Mario, Tutino Roberta, Wang Chen, Wang Zhenyi, Wang Zhenquan, Wu Jiong, Zhang Yuru, Zhao Shipeng, Zeng Xiandong, Fernandes Vitor, Moser Karl-Heinz, Ren Donglin, Sileri Pierpaolo, Gravante Gianpiero
Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Colorectal Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02258-2.
Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, significant variability exists in its clinical application regarding patient selection, procedural techniques, and postoperative management. This study aimed to assess real-world practice patterns among international experts, summarize existing evidence through a systematic literature review, and develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify studies evaluating polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Additionally, an international survey was distributed to 30 experts in proctology and colorectal surgery to explore variations in indications, perioperative management, technique, and follow-up. Survey responses were analyzed descriptively to identify common trends and areas of divergence. Subsequently, based on both the experts' opinions and the results of the survey, a Delphi method was employed to produce clinical practice recommendations. The questions for the Delphi process were developed by the authors leading the project, followed by a detailed discussion with the whole panel of experts. Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases. Preoperative bowel preparation and anesthesia use varied widely. The preferred concentration was 3% polidocanol, with 2 mL injected per hemorrhoidal pile in most cases. Post-procedural care lacked standardization, though stool softeners and flavonoids were commonly recommended. Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent. The present article offers a comprehensive suite of clinical practice expert-based recommendations concerning the use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for HD. However, there is still significant variation in its application. These findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize procedural strategies and long-term outcomes.
聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法作为一种治疗痔病(HD)的微创治疗方法,越来越受到关注。然而,其在患者选择、操作技术和术后管理等临床应用方面存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估国际专家的实际临床实践模式,通过系统的文献综述总结现有证据,并制定基于证据的临床实践建议。我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行了系统综述,以识别评估聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法治疗HD的研究。共有20项研究符合纳入标准。此外,我们向30位直肠病学和结直肠外科专家发放了一份国际调查问卷,以探讨在适应证、围手术期管理、技术和随访方面的差异。对调查问卷的回复进行描述性分析,以确定常见趋势和分歧领域。随后,基于专家意见和调查结果,采用德尔菲法制定临床实践建议。德尔菲法的问题由项目负责人提出,随后与全体专家进行了详细讨论。大多数专家(90%)报告主要将聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法用于戈利格尔II级HD,67%的专家将其应用扩展至III级病例。术前肠道准备和麻醉使用差异很大。首选浓度为3%聚多卡醇,大多数情况下每个痔核注射2 mL。术后护理缺乏标准化,不过通常推荐使用大便软化剂和类黄酮。与橡皮圈套扎术相比,聚多卡醇泡沫被认为成功率更高(88.3%对66.7%),复发率更低(16.1%对41.2%)。不良事件很少发生。本文提供了一套全面的基于专家临床实践的建议,涉及聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法治疗HD的应用。然而,其应用仍存在显著差异。这些发现凸显了制定标准化指南和进一步研究以优化操作策略和长期疗效的必要性。