Suppr超能文献

Differential effects of haloperidol and clozapine on the reinforcing efficacy of food reward in an alleyway reacquisition paradigm.

作者信息

Wiley J L, Porter J H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23284-2018.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Jul;36(3):569-73. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90257-i.

Abstract

Using the alleyway reacquisition procedure developed by Horvitz and Ettenberg, the present study compared the effects of a typical neuroleptic haloperidol (0.15 and 0.30 mg/kg) to those of an atypical neuroleptic clozapine (5.0 and 10 mg/kg) on running times 24 hours after a single food-rewarded trial administered during an extinction regimen. Rats that received food reward plus an injection of vehicle or 0.15 mg/kg haloperidol ran faster on the subsequent test day than did nonrewarded rats. The 0.30 mg/kg dose of haloperidol blocked this reacquisition effect, yielding results consistent with the anhedonia hypothesis. Clozapine (5.0 and 10 mg/kg), however, failed to block the reacquisition of alleyway running. Thus, unlike haloperidol, clozapine did not produce anhedonic effects in this reacquisition paradigm. These results suggest that neither motor nor anhedonic properties of neuroleptics appear to be crucial to the clinical efficacy of neuroleptics.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验