• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组复发风险与乳腺癌患者幸福感之间的关联。

Association between genomic recurrence risk and well-being among breast cancer patients.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2013 Jun 18;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-295.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-13-295
PMID:23777535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3689597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gene expression profiling (GEP) is increasingly used in the rapidly evolving field of personalized medicine. We sought to evaluate the association between GEP-assessed of breast cancer recurrence risk and patients' well-being.

METHODS

Participants were Dutch women from 10 hospitals being treated for early stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the MINDACT trial (Microarray In Node-negative and 1 to 3 positive lymph node Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy). As part of the trial, they received a disease recurrence risk estimate based on a 70-gene signature and on standard clinical criteria as scored via a modified version of Adjuvant! Online. \Women completed a questionnaire 6-8 weeks after surgery and after their decision regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. The questionnaire assessed perceived understanding, knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction, distress, cancer worry and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), 6-8 weeks after surgery and decision regarding adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Women (n = 347, response rate 62%) reported high satisfaction with and a good understanding of the GEP information they received. Women with low risk estimates from both the standard and genomic tests reported the lowest distress levels. Distress was higher predominately among patients who had received high genomic risk estimates, who did not receive genomic risk estimates, or who received conflicting estimates based on genomic and clinical criteria. Cancer worry was highest for patients with higher risk perceptions and lower satisfaction. Patients with concordant high-risk profiles and those for whom such profiles were not available reported lower quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Patients were generally satisfied with the information they received about recurrence risk based on genomic testing. Some types of genomic test results were associated with greater distress levels, but not with cancer worry or HRQoL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN

ISRCTN18543567.

摘要

背景

基因表达谱(GEP)越来越多地用于快速发展的个体化医学领域。我们试图评估 GEP 评估的乳腺癌复发风险与患者健康之间的关系。

方法

参与者是来自 10 家医院的荷兰女性,她们正在接受早期乳腺癌治疗,参加了 MINDACT 试验(微阵列在淋巴结阴性和 1 至 3 个阳性淋巴结疾病中可能避免化疗)。作为试验的一部分,她们根据 70 个基因特征和通过改良版 Adjuvant! Online 评分的标准临床标准获得疾病复发风险估计。\女性在手术后 6-8 周并在决定辅助化疗后完成了一份问卷。该问卷评估了手术后 6-8 周和决定辅助化疗后的感知理解、知识、风险感知、满意度、困扰、癌症担忧和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

结果

女性(n=347,响应率 62%)报告对他们收到的 GEP 信息非常满意并理解透彻。来自标准和基因组测试的低风险估计的女性报告的困扰水平最低。困扰主要出现在接受高基因组风险估计、未接受基因组风险估计或基于基因组和临床标准接受冲突估计的患者中。癌症担忧对于风险感知较高且满意度较低的患者最高。具有一致性高风险特征的患者和没有此类特征的患者报告的生活质量较低。

结论

患者通常对基于基因组检测获得的复发风险信息感到满意。某些类型的基因组测试结果与较高的困扰水平相关,但与癌症担忧或 HRQoL 无关。

试验注册

ISRCTN:ISRCTN85245026。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f7/3689597/5fa62af8ad80/1471-2407-13-295-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f7/3689597/84ea08b805c8/1471-2407-13-295-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f7/3689597/5fa62af8ad80/1471-2407-13-295-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f7/3689597/84ea08b805c8/1471-2407-13-295-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f7/3689597/5fa62af8ad80/1471-2407-13-295-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between genomic recurrence risk and well-being among breast cancer patients.基因组复发风险与乳腺癌患者幸福感之间的关联。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jun 18;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-295.
2
70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age.70 基因特征作为早期乳腺癌治疗决策的辅助手段:MINDACT 三期随机试验的更新结果,附有按年龄进行的探索性分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):476-488. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00007-3. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Women's experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk.女性对乳腺癌复发风险基因检测的体验。
Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):1992-2000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24990.
4
Association Between 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Score and Locoregional Recurrence Rates in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.21 基因检测复发评分与淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者局部区域复发率的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):505-511. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5559.
5
The impact of a genomic assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment recommendations in early breast cancer.基因组分析(Oncotype DX)对早期乳腺癌辅助治疗建议的影响。
Med J Aust. 2013 Aug 5;199(3):205-8. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11334.
6
70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.70 基因特征作为早期乳腺癌治疗决策的辅助手段。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253.
7
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.肿瘤分析测试指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(30):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta23300.
8
Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: Update of the ASCO Endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Guideline.患者和疾病因素在早期可手术乳腺癌辅助全身治疗决策中的作用:ASCO 更新对加拿大安大略癌症护理指南的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1965-1977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00948. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.安大略省前瞻性评估 21 基因复发评分检测在乳腺癌决策中的应用。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1065-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.8503. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Understanding how breast cancer patients use risk information from genomic tests.理解乳腺癌患者如何使用基因组测试的风险信息。
J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;36(6):567-73. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9449-6. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor dormancy and relapse: understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer recurrence.肿瘤休眠与复发:理解癌症复发的分子机制
Mil Med Res. 2025 Feb 11;12(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00595-2.
2
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Modified Breast Cancer Worry Scale.改良版乳腺癌担忧量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度

本文引用的文献

1
Psychosocial and Quality of Life in Women Receiving the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay: The Impact of Decision Style in Women with Intermediate RS.接受21基因复发评分检测的女性的心理社会状况和生活质量:决策方式对中等复发评分女性的影响。
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:728290. doi: 10.1155/2012/728290. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
2
The EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial is feasible: results of the pilot phase.EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT 试验是可行的:试验前期的结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Dec;47(18):2742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
3
Women's experiences with genomic testing for breast cancer recurrence risk.
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1681-1687.
4
Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of genomic testing in cancer: a systematic review.癌症基因检测的心理社会和行为结果:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):28-35. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0257-5. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.基因检测和患者报告结局对辅助化疗接受情况的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(3):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
女性对乳腺癌复发风险基因检测的体验。
Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):1992-2000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24990.
4
Knowledge of genomic testing among early-stage breast cancer patients.早期乳腺癌患者对基因检测的认知。
Psychooncology. 2011 Jan;20(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/pon.1699.
5
Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.前瞻性多中心研究 21 基因复发评分检测对肿瘤内科医生和患者选择辅助乳腺癌治疗的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1671-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2119. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
6
Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.治疗阈值:2009年早期乳腺癌主要治疗的圣加仑国际专家共识要点
Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1319-29. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp322. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) as a tool in coverage with evidence development: the case of the 70-gene prognosis signature for breast cancer diagnostics.建设性技术评估(CTA)作为证据生成覆盖中的一种工具:以用于乳腺癌诊断的70基因预后特征为例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):73-83. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090102.
8
Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer.70基因预后特征在淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中的验证
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Oct;117(3):483-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0191-2. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
9
Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial.70基因检测的临床应用:MINDACT试验
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):729-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3222.
10
Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER).使用70基因特征预测淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的预后:一项基于社区的前瞻性可行性研究(RASTER)
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70346-7. Epub 2007 Nov 26.