Suppr超能文献

改良版乳腺癌担忧量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Modified Breast Cancer Worry Scale.

作者信息

Timur Taşhan Sermin, Uçar Tuba, Aksoy Derya Yeşim, Nacar Gülçin, Erci Behice

机构信息

Dept. of Women Health and Diseases Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Dept. of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1681-1687.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many assessment instruments used for cancer worry. Many women worry about breast cancer, but In Turkey, there is no scale that assesses the worry about developing breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Breast Cancer Worry Scale (BCWS). This scale was created as a modified version of the Cancer Worry Scale.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a Family Health Center (FHC) located in eastern Turkey using a methodological design. The study sample consisted of 610 healthy women who referred to a FHC for any reason. The data were collected using the Participant Information Form and BCWS with a face-to-face interview conducted between Jun 2015 and Jan 2016. Construct validity of the scales was tested via factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, item-total score correlation coefficient, and test-retest correlations were calculated to check for reliability.

RESULTS

The factor load values of BCWS were found to be between 0.45 and 0.79. The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.78, and the total score correlations of items ranged between 0.32 and 0.64. The test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.81 (=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the BCWS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the effect of breast cancer worry on daily activities and mental condition.

摘要

背景

有许多用于评估癌症担忧的工具。许多女性担心乳腺癌,但在土耳其,尚无评估患乳腺癌担忧程度的量表。本研究的目的是调查土耳其乳腺癌担忧量表(BCWS)的有效性和可靠性。该量表是作为癌症担忧量表的修订版编制而成。

方法

本研究采用方法学设计,在土耳其东部的一家家庭健康中心(FHC)开展。研究样本包括610名因任何原因前往FHC就诊的健康女性。于2015年6月至2016年1月期间,通过面对面访谈,使用参与者信息表和BCWS收集数据。通过因子分析测试量表的结构效度,计算克朗巴哈α系数、项目总分相关系数,并进行重测相关性分析以检验可靠性。

结果

BCWS的因子负荷值在0.45至0.79之间。该量表的总克朗巴哈α系数为0.78,各项目的总分相关性在0.32至0.64之间。该量表的重测信度系数为0.81(P = 0.001)。

结论

土耳其版BCWS是评估乳腺癌担忧对日常活动和心理状况影响的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

2
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
4
Turkish validity and reliability study for the person-centered maternity care scale.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Sep;47(9):3211-3222. doi: 10.1111/jog.14913. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
5
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Paediatric Cancer Coping Scale (PCCS).
Int J Nurs Pract. 2022 Aug;28(4):e13037. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13037. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
The validity and reliability of the Antenatal Perceived Stress Inventory Turkish version: A methodological study.
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Oct;39(10):1140-1157. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1469635. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire of the University of Malaga (DFSQUMA).
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2023 Oct 31:15347346231209205. doi: 10.1177/15347346231209205.
8
Development of the Turkish version of the oral health assessment tool: Methodological study.
Spec Care Dentist. 2023 Jul-Aug;43(4):416-424. doi: 10.1111/scd.12775. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.
Balkan Med J. 2018 May 29;35(3):238-244. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.1998.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of Barriers Preventing Regular Mammography Screening.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025 Apr 23;52(3):E65-E76. doi: 10.1188/25.ONF.E65-E76.
3
Investigation of the Effect of Women's Breast Cancer Worry Levels on Breast Cancer Prevention Behavior.
Eur J Breast Health. 2023 Oct 1;19(4):279-286. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-4-4. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Theory-based training to promote breast cancer screening among women with breast cancer worries: randomized controlled trial.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2020 Mar;138(2):158-166. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.033430092019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Exploring the association between dispositional cancer worry, perceived risk, and physical activity among college women.
J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(3):216-20. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.983927. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Prevalence, risk factors and disease knowledge of breast cancer in Pakistan.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(11):4411-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.11.4411.
4
Measuring dispositional cancer worry in China and Belgium: a cross-cultural validation.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(2):189-206. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2013.874002.
5
Association between genomic recurrence risk and well-being among breast cancer patients.
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jun 18;13:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-295.
6
The Cancer Worry Scale: detecting fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors.
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):E44-50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182813a17.
7
Factors associated with breast cancer worry 3 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
Psychooncology. 2013 Apr;22(4):936-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3066. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
8
Genetic risk, perceived risk, and cancer worry in daughters of breast cancer patients.
J Genet Couns. 2011 Apr;20(2):157-64. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9336-7. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
9
Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010;28(5):470-89. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2010.498459.
10
[Spanish version of the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS). Cross cultural adaptation and validity and reliability analysis].
Med Clin (Barc). 2011 Jan 15;136(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 Jun 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验