Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2457-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5823.
Tissue verification of noncaseating granulomas is recommended for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Bronchoscopy with transbronchial lung biopsies, the current diagnostic standard, has moderate sensitivity in assessing granulomas. Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal aspiration appears to be a promising diagnostic technique.
To evaluate the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy vs endosonography in the diagnosis of stage I/II sarcoidosis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized clinical multicenter trial (14 centers in 6 countries) between March 2009 and November 2011 of 304 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary sarcoidosis (stage I/II) in whom tissue confirmation of noncaseating granulomas was indicated.
Either bronchoscopy with transbronchial and endobronchial lung biopsies or endosonography (esophageal or endobronchial ultrasonography) with aspiration of intrathoracic lymph nodes. All patients also underwent bronchoalveolar lavage.
The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield for detecting noncaseating granulomas in patients with a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The diagnosis was based on final clinical judgment by the treating physician, according to all available information (including findings from initial bronchoscopy or endosonography). Secondary outcomes were the complication rate in both groups and sensitivity and specificity of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.
A total of 149 patients were randomized to bronchoscopy and 155 to endosonography. Significantly more granulomas were detected at endosonography vs bronchoscopy (114 vs 72 patients; 74% vs 48%; P < .001). Diagnostic yield to detect granulomas for endosonography was 80% (95% CI, 73%-86%); for bronchoscopy, 53% (95% CI, 45%-61%) (P < .001). Two serious adverse events occurred in the bronchoscopy group and 1 in the endosonography group; all patients recovered completely. Sensitivity of the bronchoalveolar lavage for sarcoidosis based on CD4/CD8 ratio was 54% (95% CI, 46%-62%) for flow cytometry and 24% (95% CI, 16%-34%) for cytospin analysis.
Among patients with suspected stage I/II pulmonary sarcoidosis undergoing tissue confirmation, the use of endosonographic nodal aspiration compared with bronchoscopic biopsy resulted in greater diagnostic yield.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00872612.
组织学验证非干酪样肉芽肿是诊断结节病的推荐方法。目前的诊断标准支气管镜下经支气管肺活检在评估肉芽肿方面具有中等敏感性。经支气管超声内镜引导下经支气管或经胸壁淋巴结穿刺抽吸术似乎是一种很有前途的诊断技术。
评估支气管镜检查与经支气管超声内镜检查在诊断Ⅰ/Ⅱ期结节病中的诊断效能。
设计、地点和患者:2009 年 3 月至 2011 年 11 月,在 6 个国家的 14 个中心进行了一项随机临床试验,纳入了 304 例疑似肺结节病(Ⅰ/Ⅱ期)患者,这些患者需要组织学确认非干酪样肉芽肿。
支气管镜检查并进行经支气管和经支气管肺活检,或经支气管超声内镜引导下经支气管或经胸壁淋巴结穿刺抽吸术。所有患者还进行了支气管肺泡灌洗。
主要结局是最终诊断为结节病的患者中,检测非干酪样肉芽肿的诊断效能。该诊断是根据治疗医生根据所有可用信息(包括初始支气管镜或经支气管超声内镜检查结果)做出的最终临床判断。次要结局是两组的并发症发生率以及支气管肺泡灌洗在诊断结节病中的敏感性和特异性。
共有 149 例患者被随机分配至支气管镜组,155 例患者被分配至经支气管超声内镜组。经支气管超声内镜组检测到的肉芽肿明显多于支气管镜组(114 例患者 vs 72 例患者;74% vs 48%;P<0.001)。经支气管超声内镜诊断肉芽肿的效能为 80%(95%CI,73%-86%);支气管镜检查为 53%(95%CI,45%-61%)(P<0.001)。支气管镜组发生 2 例严重不良事件,经支气管超声内镜组发生 1 例;所有患者均完全康复。基于 CD4/CD8 比值的支气管肺泡灌洗对结节病的敏感性,流式细胞术为 54%(95%CI,46%-62%),细胞离心涂片分析为 24%(95%CI,16%-34%)。
在疑似Ⅰ/Ⅱ期肺结节病患者中,与支气管镜活检相比,经支气管超声内镜下淋巴结穿刺抽吸术的诊断效能更高。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00872612。