Mathew Roshen, Roy Winnie Elma, Thomas Elizabel Susan, Meena Nikhil, Danilevskaya Olesya
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West Virginia University Camden Clark Medical Center, Parkersburg, WV, USA.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4217-4228. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-348. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided mediastinal/hilar cryobiopsy (MedCryoBx) is a relatively new modality, being combined with EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) to improve yield in the diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the diagnostic yield of MedCryoBx versus EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic adenopathy.
We conducted a systematic search using Google Scholar, Embase, and PubMed/MEDLINE for studies about a diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy using MedCryoBx and EBUS-TBNA. Two authors separately reviewed studies for inherent bias using the Quality Assessment Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Inverse Variance weighting for random effects methodology was used for meta-analysis. Pooled diagnostic yields overall and for subgroups were estimated. Complications of MedCryoBx were reviewed.
Ten studies with 844 patients undergoing either biopsy procedure were in the final analysis. A total of 554 patients underwent MedCryoBx and 704 patients EBUS-TBNA. Meta-analysis showed a pooled diagnostic yield of 91% (504 of 554) for MedCryoBx and 81% (567 of 704) for EBUS-TBNA, with odds ratio (OR) of 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6 to 3.91; P<0.001], with I of 20%. Subgroup analysis for benign conditions showed increased diagnostic yield with OR of 7.95 (91% MedCryoBx versus 58% EBUS-TBNA, P<0.001) with an I of 25%. Subgroup analysis for lymphoma showed a statistically significant increase in pooled diagnostic yield with OR of 11.48 (87% MedCryoBx versus 29% EBUS-TBNA, P=0.001). Mild bleeding (36.5%) without any intervention was the most common complication. Bleeding requiring intervention (0.7%) was noted in patients. Pneumothorax (0.4%) and pneumomediastinum (0.4%) were less common in this analysis.
MedCryoBx is a very promising tool for the diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy. It has improved diagnostic yield over EBUS-TBNA in benign and possibly lymphoproliferative diseases, but less so in lung cancer. The complication rates with MedCryoBx are comparable to EBUS-TBNA.
支气管内超声(EBUS)引导下纵隔/肺门冷冻活检(MedCryoBx)是一种相对较新的技术,它与EBUS引导下经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)相结合,以提高胸内淋巴结病的诊断阳性率。本荟萃分析旨在研究MedCryoBx与EBUS-TBNA对胸内淋巴结病的诊断阳性率。
我们使用谷歌学术、Embase和PubMed/MEDLINE对关于使用MedCryoBx和EBUS-TBNA诊断胸内淋巴结病的研究进行了系统检索。两位作者分别使用质量评估数据提取与合成工具-2(QUADAS-2)对研究的内在偏倚进行了评估。采用随机效应方法的逆方差加权进行荟萃分析。估计总体及亚组的合并诊断阳性率。对MedCryoBx的并发症进行了综述。
最终纳入分析的有10项研究,共844例患者接受了其中一种活检操作。共有554例患者接受了MedCryoBx,704例患者接受了EBUS-TBNA。荟萃分析显示,MedCryoBx的合并诊断阳性率为91%(554例中的504例),EBUS-TBNA为81%(704例中的567例),优势比(OR)为2.5[95%置信区间(CI):1.6至3.91;P<0.001],I²为20%。良性疾病的亚组分析显示诊断阳性率增加,OR为7.95(MedCryoBx为91%对比EBUS-TBNA为58%,P<0.001),I²为25%。淋巴瘤的亚组分析显示合并诊断阳性率有统计学显著增加,OR为11.48(MedCryoBx为87%对比EBUS-TBNA为29%,P=0.001)。无需任何干预的轻度出血(36.5%)是最常见的并发症。有患者出现需要干预的出血(0.7%)。气胸(0.4%)和纵隔气肿(0.4%)在本分析中较少见。
MedCryoBx是诊断胸内淋巴结病的一种非常有前景的工具。在良性疾病以及可能的淋巴增殖性疾病中,其诊断阳性率高于EBUS-TBNA,但在肺癌中则不然。MedCryoBx的并发症发生率与EBUS-TBNA相当。