Suppr超能文献

人工破膜以缩短自然产程。

Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.

作者信息

Smyth Rebecca M D, Markham Carolyn, Dowswell Therese

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 18;2013(6):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 April 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed identified studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat.

MAIN RESULTS

We have included 15 studies in this updated review, involving 5583 women. Amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes (no amniotomy) for spontaneous labour There was no clear statistically significant difference between women in the amniotomy and control groups in length of the first stage of labour (mean difference (MD) -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.63), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (MD -1.10, 95% CI -7.15 to 4.95) or Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.00). There was no consistency between trials regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. Amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes (no amniotomy) for spontaneous labours that have become prolonged There was no clear statistically significant difference between women in the amniotomy and control group in caesarean section (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.08), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (MD 22.00, 95% CI 2.74 to 41.26) or Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.12 to 66.11).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.

摘要

背景

分娩期间故意人工破膜,有时称为羊膜穿刺术或“破水”,是现代产科和助产实践中最常用的操作之一。羊膜穿刺术的主要目的是加速宫缩,从而缩短产程。然而,人们担心这会对产妇和婴儿产生意外不良影响。

目的

确定单纯羊膜穿刺术对常规缩短所有自然发动分娩产程的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2013年4月30日)。

选择标准

比较单纯羊膜穿刺术与保留胎膜的随机对照试验。我们排除了半随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者评估纳入的研究,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。主要分析采用意向性分析。

主要结果

在本次更新的综述中,我们纳入了15项研究,涉及5583名女性。自然分娩中单纯羊膜穿刺术与保留胎膜(未行羊膜穿刺术)相比:羊膜穿刺术组和对照组女性在第一产程时长(平均差(MD)-20.43分钟,95%置信区间(CI)-95.93至55.06)、剖宫产(风险比(RR)1.27,95%CI 0.99至1.63)、产妇对分娩体验的满意度(MD -1.10,95%CI -7.15至4.95)或5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分(RR 0.53,95%CI 0.28至1.00)方面,均无明显统计学显著差异。各试验在分娩期间羊膜穿刺术的时机(根据宫颈扩张情况)方面缺乏一致性。产程延长的自然分娩中单纯羊膜穿刺术与保留胎膜(未行羊膜穿刺术)相比:羊膜穿刺术组和对照组女性在剖宫产(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.15至6.08)、产妇对分娩体验的满意度(MD 22.00,95%CI 2.74至41.26)或5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分(RR 2.86,95%CI 0.12至66.11)方面,均无明显统计学显著差异。

作者结论

基于本综述的结果,我们不建议将羊膜穿刺术作为标准分娩管理和护理的常规部分引入。我们建议将本综述中的证据提供给接受羊膜穿刺术的女性,这可能有助于女性与其护理人员之间进行讨论并做出最终决策。

相似文献

1
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.人工破膜以缩短自然产程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 18;2013(6):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub4.
2
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.人工破膜以缩短自然产程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub3.
3
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.人工破膜缩短自然产程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2.
4
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
5
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2.
6
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
7
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.分娩过程中疼痛管理的催眠疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
9
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3(3):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Rupture of Membranes and Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes: A Systematic Review of Feto-Maternal Outcomes.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 21;17(1):e77760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77760. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.人工破膜以缩短自然产程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub3.
5
Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour.人工破膜缩短自然产程。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2.
6
A trial of amniotomy in a Palestinian hospital.巴勒斯坦一家医院的人工破膜试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 May;27(4):368-73. doi: 10.1080/01443610701327537.
7
Amniotomy in labor.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Mar;96(3):197-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.004. Epub 2007 Feb 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验