• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生和健康与福利委员会:前因、理论与发展。

Public health and health and wellbeing boards: antecedents, theory and development.

机构信息

Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2013 Sep;133(5):248-53. doi: 10.1177/1757913913490086. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1177/1757913913490086
PMID:23780754
Abstract

The 2012 Health and Social Care Act transfers responsibility for public health in England from primary care trusts to local authorities. This article traces the theoretical and policy antecedents of the proposals and highlights some key changes since their original conception in the 2010 public health white paper. It suggests that the development of health and well-being boards and their objectives can best be understood by viewing them through the theoretical prism of public value or new public service theory and concludes with some recommendations for their implementation and development.

摘要

2012 年《健康和社会保健法案》将英格兰的公共卫生责任从初级保健信托转移到地方当局。本文追溯了这些提案的理论和政策渊源,并强调了自 2010 年公共卫生白皮书中最初提出以来的一些关键变化。它建议通过公共价值或新公共服务理论的理论棱镜来最好地理解健康和福祉委员会及其目标的发展,并对其实施和发展提出了一些建议。

相似文献

1
Public health and health and wellbeing boards: antecedents, theory and development.公共卫生和健康与福利委员会:前因、理论与发展。
Perspect Public Health. 2013 Sep;133(5):248-53. doi: 10.1177/1757913913490086. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
2
Lessons from New Zealand for England's NHS Foundation Trusts.新西兰给英格兰国民保健服务基金会信托机构的启示。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Apr;9(2):104-9. doi: 10.1258/135581904322987526.
3
Clinical focus and public accountability in English NHS Trust Board meetings.英国国民保健署信托董事会会议中的临床重点和公共问责制。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Jan;18(1):13-20. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011154.
4
Views of the chairs of Scottish health boards on engagement with quality management and comparisons with English trusts.苏格兰医疗委员会主席对质量管理参与情况的看法以及与英格兰信托机构的比较。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2013;43(3):215-21. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2013.305.
5
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.英国(英格兰):卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx.
6
Joining up health and planning: how Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) can inform health and wellbeing strategies and spatial planning.将健康与规划相结合:联合战略需求评估 (JSNA) 如何为健康和福祉战略及空间规划提供信息。
Perspect Public Health. 2013 Sep;133(5):254-62. doi: 10.1177/1757913913488331. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
The national continuous quality improvement tool for mental health education: results of targeted and supported implementation in England.
J Interprof Care. 2006 Jun;20(3):276-89. doi: 10.1080/13561820600727189.
8
Interaction between non-executive and executive directors in English National Health Service trust boards: an observational study.英国国家医疗服务体系信托委员会中非执行董事与执行董事之间的互动:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 15;15:470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1127-2.
9
Cherry picking: health and wellbeing boards.挑选有利信息:健康与福祉委员会。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(21):1249. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.21.1249.
10
Governance for health and wellbeing in the English NHS.英国国民保健制度中的健康与福利治理
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16 Suppl 1:14-21. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.010082.

引用本文的文献

1
The Developing Role of Evidence-Based Environmental Health: Perceptions, Experiences, and Understandings From the Front Line.循证环境卫生的发展作用:一线的认知、经验与理解
Sage Open. 2015 Oct 26;5(4):2158244015611711. doi: 10.1177/2158244015611711. eCollection 2015 Oct.