Mental Health Care Center (116), Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):961-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R751. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
Benzodiazepines are used to treat alcohol withdrawal (AW) but cause cognitive impairment, sedation, and ataxia, and interact with alcohol. Nonbenzodiazepine anticonvulsants are promising and possibly safer alternatives for the treatment of AW.
To compare follow-up measures of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS), ataxia rating, and Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol revised (CIWA-Ar) symptoms between alcohol-dependent individuals randomized to treatment with gabapentin or chlordiazepoxide.
A randomized, double-blind study was conducted in US veterans with alcohol withdrawal (DSM-IV criteria). Subjects requiring hospitalization or taking benzodiazepines or nonbenzodiazepine anticonvulsants were excluded. Twenty-six participants were randomized: 17 received gabapentin and 9 received chlordiazepoxide. Gabapentin doses were 1200 mg orally for 3 days, followed by 900 mg, 600 mg, and 300 mg for 1 day each. Chlordiazepoxide doses were 100 mg orally for 3 days, followed by 75 mg, 50 mg, and 25 mg for 1 day each. CIWA-Ar, ESS, PACS scales and evaluation for ataxia were administered daily.
Follow-up mean ESS and PACS scores did not differ significantly between treatment groups in the early treatment period (days 1-4) but were lower (mean difference -3.70; 95% CI -7.21 to -0.19; p = 0.04) and (mean difference -6.05; 95% CI -12.82 to 0.72; p = 0.08), respectively, at the end of the treatment period (days 5-7) in gabapentin-treated subjects. CIWA-Ar scores were reduced similarly in both groups. Ataxia was not observed. No significant adverse events were noted. Limitations include our small sample size and 35% loss to follow-up at the end of the treatment period.
In ambulatory veterans with symptoms of alcohol withdrawal, gabapentin treatment resulted in significantly greater reduction in sedation (ESS) and a trend to reduced alcohol craving (PACS) by the end of treatment compared to chlordiazepoxide treatment. Although limited by the small sample size, the suggestion of reduction in sleepiness and less craving warrants replication of the study with a larger sample.
苯二氮䓬类药物被用于治疗酒精戒断(AW),但会引起认知障碍、镇静和共济失调,并与酒精相互作用。非苯二氮䓬类抗惊厥药是一种有前途的、可能更安全的替代治疗酒精戒断的方法。
比较随机分配接受加巴喷丁或地西泮治疗的酒精依赖个体的随访评估量表,包括 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)、宾夕法尼亚酒精渴求量表(PACS)、共济失调评分和修订后的临床酒精戒断评估量表(CIWA-Ar)症状。
对符合 DSM-IV 标准的酒精戒断的美国退伍军人进行了一项随机、双盲研究。需要住院或正在服用苯二氮䓬类药物或非苯二氮䓬类抗惊厥药的患者被排除在外。26 名参与者被随机分配:17 名接受加巴喷丁治疗,9 名接受地西泮治疗。加巴喷丁的剂量为口服 1200mg,连用 3 天,随后每天分别服用 900mg、600mg 和 300mg。地西泮的剂量为口服 100mg,连用 3 天,随后每天分别服用 75mg、50mg 和 25mg。每日进行 CIWA-Ar、ESS、PACS 量表和共济失调评估。
在早期治疗期(第 1-4 天),两组治疗后 ESS 和 PACS 评分无显著差异,但加巴喷丁组评分较低(平均差值-3.70;95%置信区间-7.21 至-0.19;p=0.04)和(平均差值-6.05;95%置信区间-12.82 至 0.72;p=0.08),分别在治疗期结束时(第 5-7 天)。两组 CIWA-Ar 评分均显著降低。未观察到共济失调。未出现显著不良事件。局限性包括我们的小样本量和治疗结束时随访丢失 35%。
在有酒精戒断症状的门诊退伍军人中,与地西泮治疗相比,加巴喷丁治疗在治疗结束时显著降低了镇静(ESS),且有降低酒精渴求(PACS)的趋势。尽管由于样本量小,嗜睡和渴望减少的提示需要更大样本量的研究来复制,但仍有必要。