Suppr超能文献

全身冷冻疗法和冷水浸泡对膝关节皮肤温度的影响。

Effects of whole body cryotherapy and cold water immersion on knee skin temperature.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;35(1):35-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343410. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

Abstract

This study sought to (a) compare and contrast the effect of 2 commonly used cryotherapy treatments, 4 min of -110 °C whole body cryotherapy and 8 °C cold water immersion, on knee skin temperature and (b) establish whether either protocol was capable of achieving a skin temperature (<13 °C) believed to be required for analgesic purposes. After ethics committee approval and written informed consent was obtained, 10 healthy males (26.5±4.9 yr, 183.5±6.0 cm, 90.7±19.9 kg, 26.8±5.0 kg/m2, 23.0±9.3% body fat; mean±SD) participated in this randomised controlled crossover study. Skin temperature around the patellar region was assessed in both knees via non-contact, infrared thermal imaging and recorded pre-, immediately post-treatment and every 10 min thereafter for 60 min. Compared to baseline, average, minimum and maximum skin temperatures were significantly reduced (p<0.001) immediately post-treatment and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min after both cooling modalities. Average and minimum skin temperatures were lower (p<0.05) immediately after whole body cryotherapy (19.0±0.9 °C) compared to cold water immersion (20.5±0.6 °C). However, from 10 to 60 min post, the average, minimum and maximum skin temperatures were lower (p<0.05) following the cold water treatment. Finally, neither protocol achieved a skin temperature believed to be required to elicit an analgesic effect.

摘要

本研究旨在

(a) 比较和对比两种常用的冷冻疗法治疗,即 4 分钟的-110°C 全身冷冻疗法和 8°C 冷水浸泡,对膝关节皮肤温度的影响;(b) 确定这两种方案是否能够达到一种被认为具有镇痛效果的皮肤温度(<13°C)。在获得伦理委员会批准和书面知情同意后,10 名健康男性(26.5±4.9 岁,183.5±6.0cm,90.7±19.9kg,26.8±5.0kg/m2,23.0±9.3%体脂;平均值±标准差)参加了这项随机对照交叉研究。通过非接触式红外热成像技术评估髌区周围皮肤温度,并在治疗前、治疗后即刻以及此后每 10 分钟记录一次,共 60 分钟。与基线相比,两种冷却方式后即刻以及 10、20、30、40、50 和 60 分钟时,平均、最小和最大皮肤温度均显著降低(p<0.001)。全身冷冻疗法(19.0±0.9°C)后即刻和 10、20、30、40、50 和 60 分钟时的平均和最小皮肤温度均低于冷水浸泡(20.5±0.6°C)(p<0.05)。然而,从 10 分钟到 60 分钟,冷水处理后平均、最小和最大皮肤温度均较低(p<0.05)。最后,两种方案均未达到被认为具有镇痛效果的皮肤温度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验