Suppr超能文献

对比增强 MRI 检测椎体内裂隙形成:与骨折发生后时间的关系。

Contrast-enhanced MRI for detecting intravertebral cleft formation: relation to the time since onset of vertebral fracture.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Akashi-cho 9-1, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560 Japan.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):W117-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9621.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the advantages of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for detecting intravertebral clefts over unenhanced MRI in relation to the time since onset of vertebral fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 115 patients (88 women, 27 men; mean age, 77.1 years) who underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty for a single-level compression fracture within 7 days of preprocedural MRI were enrolled. Two radiologists evaluated preprocedural unenhanced MRI (T1-weighted and STIR) and CE-MRI examinations for intravertebral clefts on separate days by consensus. The time from the onset of fracture to MRI was classified into three groups: early phase fractures (< 1 month), late phase fractures (1-3 months), and chronic phase fractures (≥ 3 months). The cement distribution during percutaneous vertebroplasty was used as a reference standard, and detectability of clefts was compared between unenhanced MRI and CE-MRI in relation to the time frame. An analog of the McNemar test was used for analyses.

RESULTS

There were 104 patients (90.4%) with and 11 patients (9.6%) without a cleft. The sensitivities of unenhanced MRI and CE-MRI, respectively, for detecting clefts were 60.9% and 91.3% for early phase fractures (p = 0.02); 78.6% and 100% for late phase fractures (p = 0.014); and 92.5% and 94.3% for chronic phase fractures (p = 0.3). The specificities were the same for both groups (100% for each time frame).

CONCLUSION

CE-MRI is more sensitive than unenhanced MRI for detecting intravertebral clefts in patents with benign compression fractures less than 3 months old.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨对比增强 MRI(CE-MRI)在检测新发椎体骨折后不同时间的椎体内裂隙方面相对于常规 MRI 的优势。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究共纳入 115 例(88 例女性,27 例男性;平均年龄 77.1 岁)患者,这些患者均在经皮椎体成形术治疗前 7 天内行 MRI 检查,且仅为单一节段的压缩性骨折。两位放射科医生在不同时间分别对术前的常规 MRI(T1 加权和 STIR)和 CE-MRI 检查进行阅片,以判断椎体内裂隙。将骨折至 MRI 的时间分为三组:早期(<1 个月)、中期(1-3 个月)和晚期(≥3 个月)。以经皮椎体成形术中的骨水泥分布为参考标准,比较不同时间框架下常规 MRI 和 CE-MRI 对裂隙的检出率。采用模拟 McNemar 检验进行分析。

结果

104 例患者(90.4%)存在裂隙,11 例患者(9.6%)不存在裂隙。在早期骨折患者中,常规 MRI 和 CE-MRI 检测裂隙的灵敏度分别为 60.9%和 91.3%(p = 0.02);在中期骨折患者中,灵敏度分别为 78.6%和 100%(p = 0.014);在晚期骨折患者中,灵敏度分别为 92.5%和 94.3%(p = 0.3)。两种方法在各时间框架的特异度均为 100%。

结论

CE-MRI 较常规 MRI 对新发、小于 3 个月的良性压缩性骨折患者的椎体内裂隙更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验