Dean Marleah, Oetzel John G
a Department of Communication , Texas A&M University.
Health Commun. 2014;29(3):257-66. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.743869. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
The purpose of this study was to explore emergency department (ED) physicians' perspectives of guidelines for effective communication. More specifically, the ways in which physicians manage the tensions among effective communication dimensions framed by relational dialectics theory are examined. This study used in-depth interviews with 17 ED physicians and 70 hours of observations to identify five dimensions of effective communication: efficiency, clarity/accuracy, relevance, comprehension, and rapport. Two communication tensions resulted from these dimensions: efficiency versus rapport and efficiency versus comprehension. In almost all instances, physicians chose efficient communication at the expense of comprehension or rapport. In addition, there was a tension between patient and physician perspectives of clarity and relevance that physicians tended to resolve by emphasizing what was relevant and clear from their own perspective. Implications for managing tensions in terms of efficiency and a physician-centered approach are discussed.
本研究的目的是探讨急诊科(ED)医生对有效沟通指南的看法。更具体地说,研究考察了医生在关系辩证法理论所构建的有效沟通维度之间如何处理紧张关系。本研究采用对17名急诊科医生进行深入访谈以及70小时观察的方式,以确定有效沟通的五个维度:效率、清晰/准确、相关性、理解和融洽关系。这些维度产生了两种沟通紧张关系:效率与融洽关系以及效率与理解。在几乎所有情况下,医生都选择了以牺牲理解或融洽关系为代价的高效沟通。此外,患者和医生在清晰度和相关性方面的观点存在紧张关系,医生倾向于通过强调从他们自己角度来看相关且清晰的内容来解决这一问题。本文讨论了在效率方面处理紧张关系以及以医生为中心的方法的意义。